Member Info for ddubya

Bonzoful. If you don’t believe shareholders own their companies, my guess is that’s not in keeping with most peoples understanding.

I am not saying they all have the same sway or are treated equally, since larger shareholders do have more influence but if you asked LOAM or the founding shareholders whether they own a share of the company, I suspect they would say they do?

Nothing wrong with having a different view than me on how NANO spends its money, you are entitled to yours but I have not commented on spending.

I don’t know how many shares you hold but you can’t know how many I have either. If I told you, it may or may not be a surprise but I don’t ask others what they hold and won’t be sharing anyway.

Every share held represents a share of the total value of NANO Bonzoful, so whenever money is spent on fees, interest, salary, incentives, research, rental or anything else it is in part your money as a shareholder - simple as.

Some apparently compelling arguments that I can only agree with, without having heard anything from the BT side of the story, other than a denial or wrongdoing of course. Somewhere along the line, I think Brian may have forgotten it was our money he is spending and not just the preferred shareholder funds?

Hope this link works Mono

https://pr.report/3yRN8dXK

That’s a decent place to be Mattyboy, at a stage when the downside risk has to be near as low as it can get. I am around breakeven on a higher average but at least not underwater.

Ouch Mattyboy. I hope you are above water overall?

On the positive side, despite low confidence in realising contracts near term, there could be good news outside of the STMicro relationship, which is largely why I still remain invested. 60p could return unexpectedly on announcement of good news, whether that comes from IR sensors or less likely (I expect) from Display, where BT states there is renewed interest but I find difficult to take seriously.

We live in hope though. Having a sense of humour is essential for NANO investors’.

What are you saying Nanogeddon? The final sentence of my post conveys much the same point as you make now - display patent value has evaporated, and no one references validity of other patents.

Whatever it is, there unfortunately seems to be a sense of ‘no confidence’ in BT’s ability ti commercialise orders. Given the record of lengthy delays and cancellations, as well as the recent Samsung debacle, it is not surprising.

BT needs to deliver success before we can expect growth in the share price, something he has plainly failed to achieve to date. I hope he had a sound business plan but the continued silence might suggest otherwise?

My current guess, now that patent validity is secure, is that BT may plan to sell Display to someone like LG or Sony and the rest to other firms that might be interested, such as Google, Apple or ST Micro? Just how much that could raise is anyone’s guess but I can’t see the Display business holding much value if manufacturers can simply buy direct from Samsung. Have heard nothing to say they cannot and some indications they can.

More promising news and yet the share price stumbles again. There is something in what you say baf3 but perhaps the market knows something that we do not?
I certainly hope not.

@T. Agree, it is not asking for much, simply to know the truth.

Lol. Good idea to ask ChatGPT Equali.

The answer seems entirely credible too. If we consider NANO can put funds to good use and commercialise, we may still be in the money, although perhaps not in the big time for a few years yet.

It would be nice if Brian was brave enough to update all long suffering shareholders (who have made his salary and package possible) on what the future holds, and not just the select few.

Tornado. NigWit would have said the market never gets the valuation wrong, so it reflects fair value today.

However, cynical old me says that certain market participants have the ability to bring the price down to an entry point to suit them when circumstances are right, as they are here - with willing sellers.

I am betting it will rebound significantly from here but when is anyone’s guess. Depends on the timing of news we expect regarding orders (or indeed other news such as detail of BT’s cunning plan, if he indeed possesses such a thing).

Yes Henry, lots of unknowns. We shall hear in time but given the recent performance confidence as to the size and number of orders has a bit of a jolt, mine included. I shall be here for a while longer though.

Apparently, a few of us have always known how things would turn out and always made the correct calls. What a nice feeling that must be!

So Giga. Are you saying the Chairman knew the share price would be on the floor months ago?

Hi Henry. What I mean is that if no orders are secured (which I doubt) we shall have money but I don’t think the market would value us at more than cash value, which will diminish over time.

DW. I believe that if BT had commercially sensitive knowledge the Chairman would too, and in such circumstances the firm would enter a ‘Closed’ period, so no Director could trade NANO shares.

I believe it means is that they do not have news to announce, or at least not today but that could change any time.

I feel very much let down but at least the firm is on a sound financial footing and it is now able to plan and invest, which should accelerate production, or at least I would hope so.

If IR sensor orders are received, I suspect our exit is more likely to come in the form of a takeover? The alternative does not bear thinking about.

You were not to know that the outcome would be so disappointing Feeks. The fact is that the everything BT said and nothing in the RNS pointed to this result.

I must admit that some others called it right but I suspect only because of their gut feeling not fact. Well done to them.

I am going long again and holding at least until Nano shows that it can wash its own face (ignoring the settlement value).

Agree Basscadet. Any they are even paying by instalment (like they need to). It seems that crime does pay. On the other hand £90m in the bank is going to help. Now Brian, you have work to do to justify your package. Where are those orders for IT sensors?

Yes. If you believe that NANO will negotiate a decent settlement, then today might be the day to buy the shares that some posters have offloaded?

We shall see if the RNS was as clear as you suggest in the near future Nig.

I am not sure why you would lambast the experience of others on the Board though, inferring that your experience of the legal system somehow trumps others, many of whom have experience as Directors of Ltd companies, Plc and also as sole traders.

I don’t seek to belittle your experience as you have mentioned your legal clashes a number of times over the years.

Seems a bit big headed to me I am afraid.