Member Info for Daytradenovice

Oh i see it as 'extra' life. We're not all 8 hour a night needed sleepers, some of us need less.

So Why spend all night lying pointlessly in bed if your full of beans and active.

Well those chinese are quite strategic thinkers, and love to dominate the markets they act in.

If Reardon (or whoever) is correct then supposing Big Michael flogs his stake for a few quid and who knows, he may even come to an arrangement with Shein as part of the package to flog his empires other goods via Sheins expanding business.

Winner winner for all concerned.

Well could be.

Interesting to see nobody taking any notice of Sheins eco creds (similarly here), so a few parallels.

Could be that the poster who originally suggested (cant remember who, maybe Reardon?) that Big Michael has taken up a position here to flog onto Shein post ipo.

Could be on the money

"So obsessively that you post in the middle of the night"

Is your clock wrong - its 20.36pm?

Are you my (thankfully not) my mother or something.

Seems Shein going to expand into other areas, after a 20% increase in sales to end of 2023.

Beauty be8ng one of them.

Going to eat BOO's pudding as well as lunch

"Shein has its eye on new markets

The other benefit for Shein of an expansion of its marketplace would, of course, be growth. Thus far, environmental and human rights allegations have done little to deter consumers with the company seeing a year-on-year sales growth of more than 20% in the first 10 months of 2023."

No wonder that sp aint moving.

https://www.just-style.com/features/explainer-will-sheins-plan-to-expand-beyond-fashion-work/?cf-view

Is that right is it?

Were you there, all of a sudden?

So why didnt he?

Long strong and totally wrong old boy im afraid.

p.s. see they also produced a Shein article, mentioning a 20% sales uplift. Whats BOo guided for next week again? From memory, a similar decline wasnt it.

"Yes daytrade it's such an important committee that only two out of fifteen companies could even be bothered to turn up. "

I think you'll find others made writtern submissions as physically unable to attend. But keep on spinnin bs salesman.

"If it's so important where does it feature on the BBC news site daytrade. "

LOL, so anything important features on the Bbc does it? What an absolute clown.

Nobody (other than you it seems) is even remotely 8nterested in a struggling tat flogger, far more important matters for mainstream news to cover.

"I don't think I ever said the Leicester site was closed because the cost savings was needed. I think that yet one more dumb claim that you made, that Boo was so desperate for a couple of million quid."

Oh but you did, plenty of time you blabbed on about the cost saving and fat trimming. As did a few of your hangers on. Porkies again.

"Man, you don't have keep embarrassing yourself, why all this effort to put down a business where you apparently have only a fun punt. It's more than a little sad"

Well im sitting here laughing my head off at you trying to put the article/matter down. Struggling away like a man trying to drink the Atlantic with a soggy straw.

But you keep it up, hardly my fault you cant see the acknowledged positives in the article without resorting to the usual abusive argumentative MO you are well known for on here.

You'd still sl@g me off if i gave you the winner numbers for Saturdays draw.

Why thank you Sam, it is very kind of the company itself to pour cold, very cold, water on the rampers nonsense. "cost savings" "trim the fat" they preached.

Wrong.

Company admitted Incompetance to make the right 'quality' items, in Leicester of all places!

Agree fully on the eco principles of the customers, or lack thereof. As well as the power stations.

BOo customers want cheap cheap cheap and blow the consequences, its what the companies based on, despite its unevidenced (that is such a faux pax in from of a Parlimentary comittee) claims to be doing the right thing.

Some positive bits. Turn8ng up to face the questioners is good, so many didnt, but the performance - well, its what we have grown used to accepting.

"Great to see you have so much time on your hands to seek out irrelevance tho, just a shame that you have to reduce everything to confrontational and argumentative drivel."

Oh i think you will find the article is not "an irrelevence" except in your singularly argumentative warped mind.

Getting questioned by a Parlimentary Evidence Commitee is in fact quite a big issue, and not to be able to quantify your 'improvements' after 5 years is at best most embarrasing.

At least HM had the answers on hand, rather than not lol.

Boo rep probably briefed by some ex salesman or something and thought he could 'blag it', like salesmen always try.

Kudos, as i said for turning up, but no answers to predicatble questions?. . . . . . . well.

And as for the admission the 'centre of excellence' was closed because it couldnt cut the mustard - well, again, quite the clear honest admission. Yet you repeatedly claimed it was for "cost savings", rather than incompetance.

Finger on the wrong pulse again tradey.

Seems at least BOO had the decency to turn up for a grilling.

https://www.just-style.com/features/explainer-why-uk-put-boohoo-hm-in-environmental-impact-hot-seat/?cf-view

Come on rampers, up your game, you lot should have been onto this before a "troll" surely? ? ?

Shame the spokesman turned up so unprepared he hadnt got an answer (unlike HM) to what was clearly and sensibly an anticipated question that should have been prepd for.

"Reaney explained the biggest move at Boohoo has been purchasing products with sustainable ingredients such as organic cotton and recycled polyester to reduce emissions but he was unable to quantify how these changes have developed five years from the original evidence session." How slack is that!

Also seems the real reason for closing the Leic factory was because, despite the company repetedly badging it as a (quote) 'centre of manufacturing excellence' They closed it because they couldnt "meet desired manufacturing standards". Couldnt make it up could you. Misslabeling scandal come home to roost. So all the rampers "the BOD are cutting costs excuse" firmly dumped in the bin by the company itself, lol. Quality.

"He noted the Leicester factory was closed because it failed to meet the desired manufacturing standards the company had hoped for and the realisation that “we are a retailer, not a manufacturer,” he added."

Yet more disgraceful "manipulation", people should be on the streets waving banners and protesting.

Quick BOoHOO get a petition started for an investigation.

Buy sand, its more lucrative

Undoubtably Spidey.

Assuredly so that he's jumping up and down on the report button getting the facts removed again today. Closing down the narrative he doesnt want seen.

Hilarious,

sp being "manipulated" upwards currently, lovely to see.

Another vote for increase in divi rather than buybacks

"Let's take Frasers as a simple example. They have bought more than a fifth of the company at an average in the low to mid thirties. Nobody builds this kind of stake with an intention to sell in the short term, because they know it would be an impossibility. They have also gone on record as saying their strategy will become clear over time. So in what way are they an enforced holder daytrade? Let's have your explanation, I'm sure it will be even more embarrassing than yesterday"

Oh but they do tradey dont they. Are you tellng me that Frasers wouldnt sell if they could make a decent profit?

Never hesrd such a pile of argumentative baseless rubbish in my life.

Frasers clearly arent interested in taking this turkey over as not buying more, and have taken a stake for some reason.

Do you stupidly expect them to hold onto it forever of something?

Money talks old boy, and if, for example, the likes of Shein or uncle tom cobbly c9mes along with a decent offer, say 45p, do you not think it would be considered?

Frasers making a good few millions for a shortish hold. Of course it would.

You have absolutely no idea of frasers plans, do you? to even remotely suggest you do shows you once more to be the arrogant tradey we all know and ignore.

What a clown.

So the upshot of the rampers reasoning is its all "manipulation"

Heard this tosh more times than a certain leader apparantly stopping the boats, from the usual suspects.

There is no 'market' in this stock because nobody wants to sell any and nobody wants to buy it. Its really very simple and its surprising that all the (supposed) company 'experts' on here are still ignoring this fact, preferring half baked conspiracy theories instead.

Presumably the likes of Umar, Kamani, Fraser etc, who collectively hold a big chunk, are sitting still and wont sell as it sends the wrong message. a sell will clearly erode yet more confidence in this turkey and lets be honest there is none left after its 92% sp plunge, deluge of poor pr, bubble popping and multiple scandals. The stock market 'darling' BOo is no more.

So a significant amount of stock is held in the hands of 'enforced holders'. Then there are all the Pi's and other corporates that hold stock. They are, likely, sitting on large losses - like the deluded 'manipulation calling' rampers on here, so reluctant to sell out and recieve just the remaining crumbs of their investment back. They are, with exception of the desparate £50k top up queen on here, also reluctant to sink more capital into the same prospectless money sapping hole (and who would blame them) as they, in the main, dont see this situation that BOo finds itself in recovering to anything like the heady days, so rightly dont want to bung in more cash. There are clearly far far better prospects elsewhere - even safe bank accounts.

So, a significant amount of major investors cannot sell as it will crater the price further, and they also dont seem will8ng to buy any more either. And the further set of lower holding investors dont want to sell, at possibly a huge financial loss, so prefer the 'sh17 or bust' hold in hope view and wont commit more capital either.

Perfect storm thats completely destroyed any confidence in this as an investment moving forwards - the BOd screwed up with all the long continuing months of total radio silence and missed the oppo to change the ships course.

Looking forward to the 8th, hopefully they will reveal whats been spent of the RCF, but if those figures are viewed as poor then this be in trouble.

"If boohoo don't report an improvement in this same period then I'm afraid John Lyttles employment has reached the end of the road...."

Not sounding to confident about the likely prospects then. Penny dropping?

Although i do think your posts A bit harsh there boasty about poor John, i didnt realise you had the power to control his employment?

"Wow 1.2m shares traded in trading hours and then a half million UT, it is beyond stupid"

OMG you are STILL not banging that old manipulation drum are you.

Any ideas on just how deluded it makes you sound, trotting out the same excuse each and every day, yawwwwwn.

Welll go check it out then Boasty.

Its all there on the board from the man himself for you to read up on.

Topped up yet with that £50k?

Its all manipulation is it still, tradey2.

That records sooooo old now its worn right out

You could look back through ncyt if it pleases you Boasty, posts on there from the very man himself confirming - he even posted a screen shot of his pf to actually prove it!

Go take a look and cease with the lies - you like looking backwards afterall