RE: Right Fighting2 Jul 2022 11:19
The trouble of course is that trading for losses likes the sound of his own voice, and by the very nature of a ramper - subtle as he may at times be, is that they wish to continue to have their voice heard, so cannot bear to have their posts deminish and therefore will continue to play the victim and continue the same 'good guy' narrative, whilst posting as often as possible and trying to close down opposing views. It is the MO of a ramper.
The fact of the matter is that lies are continually being told by the deluded 'victim' to sucker and belittle others. Its not working very well here as many have seen this plenty of times before.
If you want you can make a simple easy check regards yesterdays lying ascertion that i myself only mentioned my range "3 weeks ago at most the day before i was filtered".
This is clearly yet another of his lies and easily disproven, check back on my posts for confirmation, a chink of light may appear.
I have been correctly mentioning my 50-60p range for many months, and trading for losses has repeatedly during those months critisised it as "impossible", whilst calling me a "paid deramper" during all that time.
Im sure you and many others will recall that His infamous rampy pal Uncle Doug even joined in for a time on both points. For those hard of memory you can of course easily check back to see this is the truth. Or you can keep your eyes closed and heads in the sand, no sweat to me.
The solution you seek is easily provided trading for losses himself, as you say. He could simple stop ramping trying to misslead others, telling disproven lies, calling several people "pedo" and "homophobic" many many times.
He could also give up on the "paid derampers" and "scum shorters" insults and complete fairy tales and personal opinions dressed up as 'facts'. He could also maybe answer the many questions put to him with actual answers, rather than vauge deflectings questions, further accusations and more of the above disgusting, he could also stop suggesting people have motives to "buy in lower" and reflect on others very valid negative opinions, rather than vilify them outright with no thought or consideration - afterall, these 'negative' opinions have in REALITY been borne out as 100% correct. Just look at the share price.
Trading for losses, as a rampers only answer has merely been a pointless attempt to drive such accurate and correct truthful opinions away.
To genuine investors detriment.
A good few of us here dont like people being mislead in such manner.
But each to their own, eh.