Harena6 Mar 2025 10:53
I have read the prospectus for the impending reverse takeover of Citius Resources by an Australian company called Harena, see here:
[LINK REMOVED]
I appreciate that shareholders would love to see something positive happen but I don’t think this is going to be it.
Firstly, the underlying project, a highly contentious Rare Earth Project in Madagascar, has been listed twice before. On both occasions the listings ended up wiping out shareholders. The first listing was in Germany Tantalus) and the second listing was in Singapore (Reenova). The liquidators of Reenova in a release to the Singapore Stock Exchange on 23 May 2023 stated that they viewed the project as worthless:
SGX: [LINK REMOVED]
“The value of the shares in the project have been completely written-off, due to the fact that the exploration license PR 6698 granting the exclusive rights for prospecting and research in the Rare Earth Project expired on 5 November 2021 and that there is currently no confirmation from the Ministry of Mines and Strategic Resources of Madagascar that an extension would be granted; and the application for the full mining license (Permis de Exploitation) to the Madagascar Mining Cadastral Office (Bureau du Cadastre Minier de Madagascar) in relation to the Rare Earth Project is still pending and there is currently no confirmation that the license would be granted”
Secondly, the Mining code in Madagascar was changed in 2023 and any company that did not pay for previous years permitting fees by October 2024 would be ineligible to re-apply for a new permit. Harena has failed to do according to the public ledger: [LINK REMOVED]
Thirdly, there are rumours that a creditor in Madagascar holds a valid Court mandated Pledge against the Permit and is owed a considerable amount of money by Harena. Harens deny this in their prospectus, text below, but investors should be wary:
“In April 2023, the Company’s subsidiary, Reenova Holding (Mauritius) Limited received a claim by a third party for outstanding payments for purported services rendered which pre-dates the Company’s acquisition of the subsidiary as detailed in Note 14. Based on legal advice obtained by the Company, the Directors are of the view the claim is wholly without merit. While no legal proceedings have been commenced, ongoing conferrals are taking place on a confidential and without prejudice basis and the Company is unable to disclose details of those discussions. Further updates will be provided if the matter is resolved or if proceedings are commenced.”
Finally, the prospectus makes no mention of the fact that the project has been the subject of substantial negative press both locally and internationally. These include an article in the French National Press in August (Le Monde), Foreign Policy in Focus and Mongobay.