Thorndon - you are giving conflicting comments about whether a vote is or is not needed for the company to delist and whether the company is listed on the main market or AIM.
Please clarify the facts so that readers are not misled.
Correct Barnard - perhaps CFD to paper - save on expense of holding underlining asset in a CFD. Bagzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz is wrong.
Wicket - there is a second Telegram thread called Dev Clever - Launch my Career. See if you can get an invite to join that. You will if I remember correctly need a recomendation.
Another constructive post - thank you Wicket (England doing quite well as I write - ****stan 208-8 - 158 ahead).
I understand that the new FD Feilim McCole is good at his job, believes that the company is worth saving, the assets are sound and is well aware of the fact that shareholders have not been kept appraised and that this needs to be remedied.
A post from someone with common sense Johnny 1949. No point renting one's spleen; best to try and resolve the problems.
Baggzz Spks and other critics. Whilst it is clear that you are hurting, you are not alone.
From what I have read there are those who are working very hard to obtain funds for the short term, given that the current status has come as a surprise to all. It also seems that Felim McCole is very capable and sees a good business which is worth saving but which is short of cash. It does not give them encouragement when there those who will do nothing except moan and groan.
Best, with respect, to say nought if you have nothing constructive to add or can do to assist when others are working hard to right the ship.
Gino - I agree ref Adam Jones' ability and am pleased that Andrew Haythorpe has confidence in him. On your second point I think that AJ is quite shy and would himself say that he is not best at front of house.
1) I can understand a shorter publicly ****ging a stock on a BB with the intention of trying to get weak holders to sell in the hope that the SP falls. 2) I can just about understand a holder who has had his fingers burnt by relying on past actions/statements of the board criticising the company publicly, altho why damage one's own holding beggars belief.
3) I cannot understand those who have invested more recently publicly criticising the company.
Those in categories 2 and 3 can always write to a board member and point out concerns even with sensible suggestions as to how to resolve those concerns; but those should not forget to congratulate when there is a decent result.
And so I firmly endorse the comment by mentalmax: "A prospective PI wouldn't know what the hell to think reading this BB".
I cannot remember which poster made the comment but I agree that Andrew Haythorpe has his eyes firmly fixed on Lolworth and Hurricane (this is not the first time that he has tried to get involved with the Hurricane prospect. The conundrum which he has to what to do with the Victoria tenements. It is there where imo he needs the support of genuine investors - why not promote one's investment?
I do not know why the company's accountant was present, but where there is a sale of a business or an asset it is usual for the proposed buyer to present to the seller a list of questions about the business or asset of which the proposed buyer would like answers before moving to exchange of contracts and completion. Those answers are provided by the seller in what is known as a disclosure document - Q and then A. In addition there may be conditions attached to the deal which need to be satisfied and the disclosure process may answer points which the proposed buyer requires answers/explanation. If the seller does not give accurate answers and the buyer post completion suffers loss, the buyer can sue for damages. The exercise therefore is not undertaken lightly. Some of the questions may relate to financial issues best answered by an accountant if the process is initially dealt with on an informal/discussion basis.
In interview, Andrew Haythorpe has spoken in a complimentary manner about Adam Jones and his team which is good enough for me. I regard AJ as rather shy and I do not believe that he holds himself out as a great public speaker. However, I value hearing from the geologist "on the ground".
In the clip which you posted of the interview of AH just after the announcement of the Hurricane deal, AH stated that drilling at Hurricane would start at the end of the Wet Season; that runs from November to March. That should hopefully fall in with the delivery and testing of the new drill if of course that drill is to be used for that purpose.
Well he was frank enough in this interview to admit that he felt that when he ramped HARL six months ago he may have made a mistake only to be justified by recent developments. He is certainly complimentary about Andrew Haythorpe. Worth a listen from circa 14 minutes.
Thank you for alerting this thread about a Doc interview with Alan Green, Tamer. Although the ECR emblem is not set out, there is a good section about ECR at about 14 minutes before Doc deals with Contango (CGO).