Member Info for DaProphet

To email.. Yes it should be stored with their isp server

Another... Who this time?

Probably site maintenance...
New spruce up...

I'm collecting them as antiques..

To be fair any test with a reader would give better results at a more variable environment surely?
It would have to be compared to a BAMS test if like for like.

When and if all is revealed about these dodgy dealings..
The uk will be shocked to the core..

Not suprised at over £100 a test.
Why is the goverment not rolling out mologic and surescreen tests at the moment instead of these crappy innova tests...

Apologies goldtrig.. You've made my day...
That's fantastic news if proved in a blinding CV. For all parties...
Game changer

of course it can be a void on the test couldnt it..
Ive not had the pleasure of doing one yet but just watched a video instructing of how to use and read... And low and behold it can give a void result..

30 postive samples tested. 29/30 came back postive with this test. So what happened to the other one??? Lol

Anyway i still stand by what I've said before 2 tests should be carried out prior to flying to supply a concrete result. Lft first then anal swab test by a lovely air hostess :))

30 positive samples were tested with Ct values of 26 and below, with half of those in the range 22-26, and the lateral flow test identified 29/30 of these correctly as positive."so 1 sample didnt give a postive reading hence a negative or a false postive" this also is only a small sample size so findings might be alittle different when larger sample sizes are used ive heard of up 1200 sample sizes being used for real world CV.

Marmited...
1 in 30 missed positives is the best we can expect until the next generation is proved. Paraytec haven't been clear yet what the specificity is have they? Although they have used more samples they didnt conclude a 100% false negative rate. Don't forget the next test the person has who wrongly passes a false postive test will odds on be a postive next time. Over time the r rate will be severely reduced with these tests done in a routine environment..

"clinical validation with a larger number of patient samples"
its already been noted elsewhere that there is less of these samples around at the moment.
hence a further delay is expected...don't shoot the messenger..

straight to the recycle bin

Can i just say.. I'm very confident with this share....

the only way this share will move up is obviously on news of everything wolves just stated.{or if it gets ramped up by the gang again}
but it doesn't look likely for the next few months. Especially now the directors have offloaded some..
no doubt to will take a hit also when the new sovereign test is confirmed and rolled out to the mass.
but for future investment perspectives its still in my portfolio..

bbrq648..
that article was published feb 04 and no doubt the study data was a month or so before....
the new tests have only just been evaluated..

Castlepaul13...wishing you best of luck with them excellent plans....
watch out for the locals if its not a holiday resort and if your not living there 24/7...

Castlepaul13..
it will be reeeet... next year. The only problem will be the price inflation when everybody's after the same thing all at once...
i imagine the next global problem will be material shortages when the world comes out of lockdowns