Potter25.I don't think it is fair to say all with concerns are derampers. There are those with hidden agendas but in all fairness the negatives have called it right. You can not blame these boards for the funding disaster. There has been an equaly substantial positive opinion that has at times attempted to clamp down on negative centiment and we currently have not increased share value, initialy secured solid funding that did not decimate holdings or moved our products forward so again in my opinion what people write does not influene the share price. It is the actions of the CEO, Board and Scientists that does. It is easy to say sell up if you don't like or average down but sometimes that is not always a possibility. People continue to support football teams even if the manager makes terrible desisions they don't like,they maon, but thats what we do. I am not trying to be argumentative and it is my opinion which of course you are entitled to disagree with.
I think there is a hope of stock piling for potential mutations. The vaccine program has been fantastic but is hugely labour intensive and will have to be maintained to keep up with future threats. There is always risk of outbreak during this time and then those who are missed by vaccine program. SNG still potentialy has a place in this market I would think and Covid will never just dissapear. I believe we still don't fully know how long antibodies remain. The vaccine is still not a year old.
Hedge It is just strange to go from being valued at 10 to 19 million on paper. I get where you are coming from on supply/demand. I suppose it is difficult to base value on market cap when you are not producing a product to sell to market or have an income. All is based on possibility or not and who wants in or out.
I may buy more if we do see 1.5. Would have to see how things played out as we approached that figure. Its hard to gage a value until the new shares hit the market. Will we remain valued at 18-19 million when we are valued at 10 today. I know there are those who see us valued far more and those less. Until the shares hit the market I think its hard to say.
Trade for 3000 at 30p just appeared on google finance. Must be wrong?
I suppose he was never going to stand there and say it was a mistake and appologise to shareholders for the massive dilution. I am sure it would be a sign of weakness and we don't know what is going on in the backgrond and who the main shareholders in the compamy are yet? I am not defending him and believe he should eat some humble pie but that won't happen while he wants to remain in control. Lets hope we see this money put to the use and some real developments going forward.
Steevy never invest based on what you read on these boards. If you do look at posting history and what outcomes were compared to what was said at the time. There are to many with their own agenda and its easy to buy on positive sentiment that others are selling into and vice versa. It takes time to get an idea about posters and even then you get caught out. Lazy information gathering can turn out to be expensive. I know because its a mistake I have made many a time.
I know Hemo is not for sale. I was finding it interesting chat about takeovers and understanding values. It is better than talking about Mint, CLNs or Vlads latest tweet. Well for me anyway. Sorry.
JHFH so they could buy the company for £60,000,000 minus their 30% or £150,000,000 minus their 30%. I am struggling. I get my figures as we were worth approx £60,000,000 when we were 15p. Now 15 would be £150,000,000
I don't need 15 to break even but know others do so if it ment them getting their money back and moving on I would be more than happy with that. I understand many would be obviously looking for a much higher value.
The price was around 1.75 most of yesterday and when I was checking it was 1.75 to buy or sell for very large amounts. At times you could buy for lower than you could sell. I think the exact figures of what were buys or sells would be difficult to workout therefore.