Member Info for Culpepper

To clarify, for me, it’s one of my two gold stocks in which I invest.

But it’s not the holy grail, is it?

I mean surely by now, most can see the outright stupidity of those who have been ramping the stock short term, as opposed to the one or two of us, questioning their common sense and motivation?

Just a typical bb I suppose.

Noswej. Mention of what you assume to be a Stanley Unwin typing style doesn’t amount to a pushback. Though in any event, it was not really possible.

It’s unfortunate you join the vast majority of those on here, as just one of the idiots.

You know, an opprttuniy for you to psh back at my rec3nt posts. I will take the reasonable view, if you don’t, you cant.

No. Just an opportunity for you to say your posts are more valid than mine.

We all know that Bamps.

It’s what they said they were doing.

I mean, as against any other old gold miners.

There are no trolls here on Ggp as a company, though some of you lot insist there is, to keep that bandwagon rolling.

Well, if you’re just investing in gold and miners on world events, pretty much nothing to do with Ggp, is it?

Dips alaways made some fair points. But has changed his rhetoric. You’ve seen it.

Gone away from chess moves, hero worship.

Far more middle of road now, at last.

Realism set in.

I see so much from Stuart Hines..

On my reading, he is perhaps a Austraian investor who posts on x?

I shall, to be honest, be disappointed if Nanaluq is not on schedule to revenue to pay for the rest. As will other shareholders..

Don’t know, but I doubt other interested parties, as per recent somewhat ‘requested’ opportunity to invest, would not have done so without at least a ‘nod’ from Olaffson.

So, on this bb, you can liken Callum to Spades, if you want - as he said - forget the £400000 I just ‘lost’, just think of the millions I made. Yadayada.

Well, on Callum, he’s obviously not bothered about cash. He’s loads down from what he could have ‘made’ it would have tanked the sp had he sold.

My best guess is is he’s ‘loyal’ to Ggp and don’t give a monkeys.

And, by the way, it’s the sheer fickleness of this board that occasioned me to add to what is seen on hereas disruption, heckled by the ‘clever’., Whatever way you choose to interpret it. On a bb.

I choose to stop that. So should you.

All the best.

And forget all this nonsense about Mr. Day.

I suspect he’s suffered a knock to his confidence, maybe ego. It happens.

He continues to drill the heck out of Telfer, and has at least, on what he knows /believes, expressed confidence in the outcome

My own opinion is that all this talk of manipulation, mms, shorters, alleged paid derampers ( as if ) , all that, is overblown and short termism. Bb stuff. And unhelpful, .

That’s only IF, you don’t think, Ggp, it’s Telfer and Hav assets, don’t have a future.

And if you believe that’s the case, or can’t wait. Well, of course you should sell.

I mean, working up to full commercial production at Hav, was always going to be earliest 2028 and on.

Don’t know, for sure, do we?

We wait on FS, and formal DTM, and cost implications, against next forecast for Telfer.

For me, in a nutshell, that’s it.

One perspective, is that this particular share seems to have been treated, on this board, by the ‘ overenthusiastic ‘ as a share which cannot be expected at times to retreat in price. Regardless of recent events, Macquarie, and so on. Bigger the expectation, as posted, the harder comes a little dose of, what in sp, is realism.

Realism, moderation, is all I have ever espoused, on the share. With inevitable on here, results.

The original strategy, as far as I can see, road to Havieron, remains intact. Though apparently, some no longer see it, or for personal reasons sell, despite stating it has always been a longer term process to get there. Telfer, was, and is, a derisking exercise to secure Hav production for the original 30% Hav, no control over Telfer, and so on. It’s now fully owned, and contributing to financing 100% Hav. Just possibly, it could pay for it. Maybe easier if delayed - though nobody here would, I think, welcome that.

I think they have, at some planning stage, to consider how through hub and spoke, utilising more of Telfer processing capacity might be achieved. No doubt they are considering whatever opportunities might exist.

And my bet is the current Telfer outlook is pretty conservative, and will at least be met, with increasing Telfer mine life. It’s an opinion. You think what you want.

There’s no operational disaster here. Plan ongoing.

‘Make no mistake - This 25% drop was triggered by the Macquarie note’

Then would it not be useful for somebody who has it to copy it here?

Though I accept, a ‘false’ note, may not be desirous on this board?

The board, it seems, were sloppy on this occasion. Any checking, ore content risk,to be done should have been done prior to prospectus. I think, on the little we know, most would agree that.

Seems to me, best people to go forward, reputations, are those responsible for any shortfall, and sort it out next time around. I would think, and they must surely have discussed the issue of a change so quickly after ASX debut, they have exercised caution in their latest.

The original plan, the road to Hav, and how to pay for it, remains on track, under Mr. Day.