Member Info for Culpepper

A lot of it’s a gamble on life expectancy, isn’t it?

Nobody knows that, rich or less rich. I imagine there’s few ‘poor’ on here.

So you’re obliged to deal with rules as they are - it was always thus.

And comply, or not.

What you do know, pretty much, there’s better ways of dealing with things for you moneyed lot than paying 40% IHT.

Thanks for your thoughts.

I have, over the years, disposed of assets, in cash, to my children.

There is no point in me, with guaranteed income, in accumulating beyond IHT threshold. But it happens.

It’s a conundrum for greedy avoiders. Particularly after death.

Sometimes, there’s something to be said for being straight up, whilst you’re able, and dispersing assets which would otherwise attract taxation whilst you’re in control of ways and means.

Well, I hope that’s wishful thinking on your part, having never been one who wants my investment to show weakness, to so say buy more.

It’s become volatile, as have others, but one trusts the original investment case, around Hav, the point of all this, remains intact.

Maybe, but reading this board somebody would accuse somebody else of clipping it.

Bit like the drugs business. Stepping on it.

Over or under ‘the mattress.’

I find it quite amusing, with so many buying Bentleys, that you’re such skinflints, and worse. Haggling with platform providers, for example.

Something wrong, somewhere.

You could always consider gifting to those that need it early in years, for them to make best use at less cost, rather than personal greed til death do us part.

Well, ‘they’ have to buy and sell, don’t they?

You can do the same.

“Just sitting back and saying the price is the price is moronic.”

So what you doing about it?

Selling or buying.

96.

My head is not in the sand. Whoever has always done what, the price you get for your shares will be what’s offered, as with any company.

So what’s your point on gold?

For what?I believe they stand behind, and have published, increasing gold prices this year.

‘There ammo has to run out at some point. ‘

In discussion, there’s lots of ‘theys’ on this board. ‘They want your shares’, being I think the most hackneyed phrase.

One day, somebody will enlighten as to who ‘they’ have been, over the years it’s been said.

I don’t think there’s need to pick at the bones on this one. High risk they say, against potential high reward.

That’s the bottom line, for a Greenland company. Investors, we’re told, awaiting proof that a company can succeed in Greenland.

Amrq has responded, to the global price of gold.

I understand that. Yet that is without anticipated guidance, on what it will mean for Amrq future. I contend, that anything above $4000 an ounce, will see Amrq strategically sound.

And well positioned in the strategic/critical minerals space, in the unexplored new frontier.

Underpinned by Nalunaq.

It’s all rather by the by, that stuff, isn’t it?

At the moment we’re looking at Telfer mine life, grades, arent we?

Nothing changed. As long as profit comes in, to pay for Havieron.

And then bulk processing.

Conversations on here are too tied to the American economy - because, I suppose, gold is priced in $USA. It’s just the way it has been, and remains. There’s other country economies, fiddling about.

If you look at economies, US per capita GDP, is far better than UK. UK has a problem, greater than USA, on those contributing.

Why revel in the supposed upset for Americans, when global economies have similar problems?

Nonsense, for price of gold, isn’t it?

There’s no real concensus on global interest rates.

I don’t know why you lot don’t desist from quoting lse buy/sell figures, based as they are on trades above or below mid, which are not representative of whether a trade is a buy or sell.

One can’t expect the brokers/analysts to guess at drilling results, and what they might mean for MRE.

As Mr Day last said, you tell me the price of gold ( in the future ) and I will tell you when Ggp might pay a dividend.

As you raise it, the argument for gold as an investment, is well-documented, particularly on this board.

On a utilitarian basis, gold has its uses, in industry, quite apart from adornment.

One should not forget the copper. And tungsten.

If one takes note of recent conversations, strategic, critical metals, will continue to be a requirement.

I can see no harm in diversifying a portfolio to take account. In a fund, or otherwise.