In simple terms, does anyone have a summary of how this will be monetized - e.g. expected production, market rates, flow of cash via ownership split etc?
What is the play? Hope that they don't get 75% approval ? This looks dead to me. A sad day for the little guy as the wealthy owner walks off with his company and leaves everyone else to sink. AIM reputation remains in tatters . We need better regulation and protection if AIM is going to be taken seriously.
I really don't see what the investment case is here - raise money to put into other business - no sustainable revenue stream so continues placings for 'investment' and opex....
By risk / hot water - i mean the pain of investigations. i don't for a minute think we actually tried to influence anyone - it's just more unwanted attention .
It's not quite that simple. If we paid a law firm, above board - based on the fair price for the service, then we are fine. If we did not, then there is a risk we may be in trouble. The Bribery Act specifically covers foreign public officials - however they end up with the money. I work in this field.
The “failure to prevent “ S7 aspects of the UK Bribery Act - could land us in some hot water here . It only affects sell side / downstream transactions so this recent article (if true ) could mean we come under scrutiny. The only defence is “adequate procedures” - so hopefully the company have evidence of training , processes and procedures in place.
Always so hard to buy in any volume given the small free float. any positive news and this will fly. Hopefully the UHC decide at some point that it's time to focus on WEB and we get some decent news.
75% down here. Lots of potential with the backing we have but very poor performance. Almost like they don't want to take advantage of the US gold rush.
I am also surprised, we hit 12 based on the Talaxis deal, then almost 30p based on ... ? now we are so much further on, and the price is around where we were back in 2016. it's been a long 8 years here.