Member Info for crawshaw

"HoT were binding not the final deal"

This is exactly the problem Bash. What exactly was 'binding' in the HoT? Why were the HoT never published? What came to light during their "extensive due diligence"? Why were DMC "not in a position to complete the transaction"?

There's no transparency, and infinite unanswered questions.

"Otherwise why believe the results Apple, Google and the like release"

🤦🏻‍♂️

Getting desperate now Bash.

Bash, I'm sorry I have to spell it out of you. You used something that was RNS'd as proof. I used an RNS to evident that you can't use an RNS as proof.

For what it's worth, whilst we're on the subject, that deal with DMC was "binding" was it not?

Give it a rest Bash. You know exactly why I used a reference to DMC.

Regardless, why would I apologise to someone who's been calling everyone childish playground names?

All investors are traders Bash.

#TRIPE

"Investors ain't selling"

Jesus Christ Bash. Why do you think this has dropped from 24p to 6p since coming out of suspension if 'investors ain't selling'?

🤦🏻‍♂️

What's with the childish name-calling Bash?

I know the accounts haven't been released, hence the lack of any proof on your part. The point is, VLRM do not "have" $279.5m, do they?

I have an RNS 'proving' £19m is coming in from DMC. An RNS isn't proof of anything, is it?

*PP1's posts

"I emailed FS with PP1’s post about them having “jumped before they were pushed”, and the CEO has responded"

Are you telling me PP1's were made up?

"Well-researched" 😅

"Especially for one that has $279.5m"

Point me towards VLRM's audited accounts with $279.5 sat on their books?

You can't. That's a fact.

I, and others, have answered both those questions Bash.

"Oh BTW 500m even for a tech company is NOT EXCESSIVE. :). Especially for one that has $279.5m."

🤦🏻‍♂️

That question has been answered numerous times Bash.

Deflecting our questions with childish remarks shows your true colours.

"Many mining and exploration companies on AIM run into the billions of shares over multi‑year development cycles"

Relevance? Are VLRM a mining and exploration company?

Can you point out which part(s) of Takecare's post you consider 'tripe' as it all appears to be factually correct?

It's relevant Bash, and was promised by the current Chairman.

I cannot see any inaccuracies in Takecare's post either.

Continue to bury your head in the sand and avoid answering any questions, it doesn't bother me.

@BashM, what your thoughts on the company not providing any transparency on the £27m+ in accumulated losses?

From the November 2023 RNS; "Valereum recognises the importance of a clear financial landscape. As a matter of urgency, we will be conducting a comprehensive internal audit of the accounting records from the previous regime. This step not only aligns with our commitment to integrity but also ensures a robust foundation for our journey ahead, and our understanding of previous events (which will be shared on the website during Q1 2024)"

Still waiting...

"Our CEO said revolutionary VGold Token"

Must be true then!

You chat peanuts GG

"We are on the edge of finding out about a revolutionary VGold token"

Bash, can you elaborate? What's revolutionary about it?