RE: My view on ST231 Dec 2018 14:07
“ADM just need to make sure the funds are available in terms suitable to secure the debt element of stage 2.”
I guess you mean to secure the required contingency sum, previously expected to be in the $4-600m range. With their liquidity, ADM should have no major issue with putting that amount, of once confirmed, into escrow IMHO.
The question is, in return for what?
A straight completion finance arrangement would typically involve an upfront fee, annual fees and interest to the extent cash is actually drawn. That would be a great outcome for us.
If they had already been granted exclusivity for North America, wouldn’t / shouldn’t that have been stated in an RNS, being a very material contract term? So maybe on that they are jumping the gun, or twisting our arms to get more than such an arrangement?
Could a deal with ADM over the contingency amount be the reason that the much-anticipated European TorP has still not materialised ...... that one is on the table with ADM’s European outfit/s others have identified, but is being held for signature until the completion finance is agreed?