RE: SSV22 Sep 2021 19:11
Well Dan judging by some others here I am not the only one a tad disappointed at the performance , but you seem to only jump on my back eh. It's a pity you can't allow folk to have a negative stance without the need to put you twopennorth in when it's not required. We are not all happy with the progress.
Are you a scientist? I doubt it posting here. So you will just have to believe the data is good , what if it isn't as good as Joe Public thinks it is?
Never count your chickens.
You tell me what research you do dan? Look for tweets? Cut and paste a bit? Look at the numbers as released last week and give your opinion? The scientific study is progressing slowly , it may not cut it eventually. You cannot research that data yourself , so don't pretend you can.
Rose tinted specs will get you nowhere , if you are not prepared to questions comments and performance of the SP then just ignore me , i want to know what a CEO means when he says we will have significant shareholder value within 6 to 9 months , and then we don't. I'd like to know why not , what changed?