L did, then bought back but large buys probably go NT. No point chasing the pennies. Most probably know value at licence, just hold and wait, all the signs this episode coming to an end.
If we find what we think is down there, then l would assume they would not use tankers but bring in Royston as well and take to main pipeline which is our capex. So going that route would be a 2023 revenue, cannot remember seeing any thoughts in regard to this.
RE: Paul Baay Director of Millennium Seismic Ltd 2000-200712 Dec 2021 07:15
Both boards need to be read, as probably 95% of links, leads and info originate on these boards. Both have heavy investors who jointly have a reasonable % of the company. I prefer LSE to live as it seems easier to use.
I was thinking about flow rates we might expect between Gas and Oil testing and the results we might expect coming.
First assumption was choke size. First assumption was so wrong as google pointed out and landed me in a minefield of information way beyond deemed necessary here and choke being only needed for flow rates concerning psi and bore sizes and other variations and safety.
So the question is between the two types of test for oil and gas, what is the criteria that the oil test will show to improve the flow rate of oil rather than a gas test. If we have 500 of boe per day on the gas test, what may we be looking at on the oil test to show the flow rate and i am sticking my neck out on this one. I think this is a MJ question.