Ryan Mee, CEO of Fulcrum Metals, reviews FY23 and progress on the Gold Tailings Hub in Canada. Watch the video here.
My big buy of a couple of weeks ago came through as a sell and not a buy so not sure what is going on.
4p very soon and then we begin to jump by 1p a day.
The first solid news to come out will double the price as all of those sitting on the fence jump in but what a ride for those that got in over the past few months.
Once this gets on the move we will of course create other opportunities. Going back to my remarks regarding finding a use for chicken s**t, whereby instead of it being a waste product it has a value, the cost of Glycerine by all accounts at the moment is at an all time low and in some ways no doubt puts the lid a bit on producing fuels from vegetable matter, but if suddenly there became a good use for it with BioMsar and in fact there were not enough the value would go up and so would the production of Bio fuels as the value created would be greater, remember a few years back when oil was over $100.00 a barrel, just about every spare field was carrying crops that could convert and pushed up the cost of corn, rape etc etc. Forget feeding the poor, feed the engines and all good for political nous.
I cannot but note we constantly refer to our present irons in the fire but of course as has been mentioned once one of these becomes a signed contract and the world takes note all of the competition be it in shipping or power production or even concrete for that matter will want to jump on the band waggon and quickly. Its all about profit, hence the present mess with commercial shipping and their Frankenstein fuel.
If the guys in Utah prove their concept the profit margins alone will draw just about every other tar sands producer to jump on Quadrise. Also if they can produce a useable product without having to ship to a refinery to incur yet more costs why not use oil directly from a well, emulsify it and burn it. It by all accounts would burn much cleaner and be so cheap to manufacture.
Like most of you I have a feeling that if everything we have learnt over the years about Quadrise is genuine, I have no reason to doubt it, once the touch paper is lit we could well all be sitting on that beach somewhere.
By the way we all have a few stocks like this in our portfolios. I have quite a bit invested in US Tech stocks and have been on a manic ride over the past months but one that I hold is a bit like Quadrise in that it has a unique product, and it has just signed its first commercial deal, many others that are, or could be massive are in the pipeline, I bought my first shares at $1.30 around six months ago. EXRO Technologies, based in Canada. The shares have just hit $4.00. They will also go to the moon.
https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/quote/QFI.L/
Well here’s the link again Indigo and I have mostly always followed Yahoo for quick updates on my investments. Who creates these I have no idea, I would guess it is normally an average of forecasts from analysts that would follow the stock and in general they have always been pretty damned accurate.
But showing QFI to be a ten bagger from where we are is quite incredible, never seen that before. Doubt I will ever see it again. Wish the guys on Robin Hood could see this as without they would all pile in overnight.
Strange thing is I feel that it is a pretty could estimate. But then if it’s going to 30 and it gets there it means we are without doubt on a roll with contracts signed and who knows where the SP will end up.
For the moment I am assuming it is a mistake and should have been three pence.
Nice rise yesterday so maybe 4p by end of next week.
Interesting times and just read the news out of Utah. They are not hanging around. Remember Maggie’s remarks on the economy being kick an elastic band, same principals here, providing the band does not snap.
Anybody know how many people are employed at QFI....
Just been thinking and then gave up any hope of producing an accurate SP based on MSAR alone.
Far too many variables and with two potential source of feedstock, Utah and other tar sands worldwide and of course the residue from a daily input of approx 100,000,000 barrels of crude with say 10% usable waste in each barrel to produce MSAR from.
Those 100,000,000 barrels are all being used somewhere and MSAR could replace a great deal of this use and help in bringing down the damage being done to the planet considerably in the not too distant future.
So assuming we can only process 1% of those 100,000,000 million barrels and allowing for plus 30% water we would have 1.3 million barrels of MSAR daily and say we received $1.00 per barrel as a royalty. (This is a low low figure)
1 ,300,000 per day for 365 days gives us a profit of $474,400,000 and lets assume it takes $74.000,000 to run the company.
$400,000,000 = ~£300,000,000 x 10 gives a company value of 3,000,000,000 and a share price of £2.65
Plus the value of the BioMSAR lets say around total £3.00 per share and we are not even scratching the bottom of the barrel, sorry for the pun.
But should this become the success we all expect over the coming years and the output from the tar sands being almost infinite and with all of its savings to the environment, who knows where this could end up. The right product at the right time at the right price.
We just need that first signature......
Just worked out that the U.K. uses around 73,000,000 tonnes of fuel a year and my fear is we would be constrained by how much Glycerin there is available, did I see a figure of 5,000,000 million tonnes in the USA, must be a lot less for us. Be lucky of we can produce more than say twenty million tonnes worldwide. At how much to QFI in royalties, maybe 100,000,000 dollars, 74,000.000 U.K. pounds. Say 50,000,000 clear. Just BioMSAR could put a value on QFI of £500,000,000.
That’s around 47 pence a share just for BioMSAR.
https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/quote/QFI.L/
Who knows, just saw this and smiled.
I yr target
You may have to wait three years but it will be worth it.
I agree Kurly, but I cannot see why with a bit of luck all of the opportunities in front of us have not been secured. As I have mentioned before I have watched and invested in QFI for many years and up to a point I do understand diesel, especially marine diesel which is why I have watched this, and for the industry that I work in the potential of the BioMSAR is so great that I just want to see it take off. I would be a gamechanger indeed. Modern tech and the fortunes being spent to create green shipping will no doubt at some point come up with an answer, or could we be invested in it, we will find out, but that will not cure the problem of the many hundreds of thousands of marine diesel equipped vessels that are floating around the world as I type polluting the planet, from the largest of supertankers to small diesel runabouts. Many of these larger vessels are and will be around for many years to come, QFI have an answer.
As for tar sands. Mining this stuff has always been an issue of contention due to the amount of pollution created just to get it out of the ground, as with offshore oil, the building of the rigs, the shipping of the oil, the tar sands project that QFI are involved in could change all of this as it is simply taken from the surface in most cases and creates very little pollution in the process and if this stuff can be burnt to produce electricity, hey ho, houses can be heated, cars, trains, factories, you name it, quite an incredible future. But one the world is screaming out for at this time. No more coal powered power stations, even that would be a massive breakthrough. But why is it or has it taken so long. In some ways this is a disruptive technology that will change the way we obtain power for the better. It will also remove from our landscape all of the jobs, technology and infrastructure involved in coal, offshore power generation, yes even windfarms that look amazing but are ugly and may one day be unnecessary, rig platforms and all of the shipping that needs to be in place to make that function.
And is there enough tar sands to keep all of this functioning, yes but it has always had the problem of cost which it seems can now be resolved. there is so much power held in tar sands that it would take decades to run out of. Also I guess scrubbers or versions of them must be used in power stations as with carbon capture which now seems to be coming of age.
Just one signature .......
OK lets see who knows, Should that be a B - T - or a W
BTW just joined the 1,000,000 club.
Pick No. 4: A MASSIVE Disrupter in a $1.5 Trillion Industry
This next company is not a small cap stock. It’s just the opposite… it’s a large cap. But it is little-known… and, more importantly, it’s cheap.
Copenhagen, Denmark-based A.P. Møller-Mærsk A/S (OTC: AMKBY) is a $37 billion market cap integrated transport and logistics company operating worldwide.
Commonly referred to as Maersk, the company has 80,000 employees and operations in more than 130 countries.
It’s the MAJOR player in the maritime shipping industry, which is currently valued at $1.5 trillion.
If there is an industry that could really benefit from a blockchain makeover… it’s the shipping industry.
The way things are now, just ONE shipment can generate up to 200 documents. The cost of processing and administering these documents is a significant expense.
Blockchain could erase all of this unnecessary paperwork… and Maersk is leading the charge to make this a reality. Maersk – the leading container ship operator based on the number of owned and chartered ships – would also be the biggest beneficiary.
Maersk recently inked a deal with IBM to fully digitize and blockchain-enable Maersk’s operations.
A blockchain digital shipping ledger can be viewed by EVERYONE involved… yet nobody can tamper with it. So instead of filling out a stack of documents, a shipping clerk could simply glance at the product’s blockchain code and confirm that everything is in order.
You can’t underestimate how huge this deal could be for its bottom line…
Maersk had $153 million in processing expenses last year. With blockchain, that number could come down to nearly ZERO.
Looking at the big picture… blockchain could save shipping carriers $38 billion a year.
Maersk is on the vanguard of this technological shift. It will have a big first-mover advantage. The reduction in expenses will go right to the bottom line.
Speaking of the bottom line, this company is already solidly profitable with $539 million in net income last year. And Maersk, now benefiting from reductions in capital spending and cost-saving measures (due to COVID-19), is seeing a big uptick in business.
In the first nine months of this year, gross profits were $5.5 billion, an increase of 30%. Free cash flow was $3 billion, up a whopping 94%. The company just initiated a $1.6 billion share buyback program.
The upside here for the stock is HUGE… It currently trades for less than $11 a share.
Diesel bug is contamination of diesel fuel by microbes such as bacteria and fungi.[1]
Water can get into diesel fuel as a result of condensation, rainwater penetration or adsorption from the air — modern biodiesel is especially hygroscopic. The presence of water then encourages microbial growth which either occurs at the interface between the oil and water or on the tank walls, depending on whether the microbes need oxygen. Species which may grow in this way include:[2]
bacteria — clostridium; desulfotomaculum; desulfovibrio; flavobacterium; hydrogenomonas; pseudomonas; sarcina
fungi — aspergillus; candida; fusarium; hormoconis resinae
Fuel companies agree that if left untreated fuel will remain reliable for just 6–12 months. After which fuel contamination (such as the diesel bug) begins to appear. Most industrial engine manufacturers now recommend a fuel conditioning programme to ensure the reliability of fuel.
Happy to be corrected, but I have always thought of it as QuadRiseFuels which is the sign of a muppet but I am sure you realise to what I was referring.
As a matter of pure interest just what are the specs of the Cummins engine they are working with. I guess I could research it but always get it wrong. Or is there a site I can go to.
What’s with the de ramping remark, cannot for the life of me see where that came from Indigo.
Why would I do that if I am holding shares, get real. I have never been involved in a chat room like this before, I do not wish to make it my profession and I am learning as I go along. What we seem to have is a bunch of old soldiers getting worn out from continually regurgitating the same old rubbish.
I don’t mind being called a muppet either despite its connotations of being akin to an idiot, I have been called worse than that through most of my life and have always smiled. Like most of you I have had to divert from my daily routine of running a business that would make most of you envious, to try to bring a bit of cheer to the investors here.
I guess all if not most invested here have their stories to tell and interestingly why they would invest in a company that adds water to tar plus a bit of magic dust with the hope of becoming millionaires, and remember I am one.
I wish you all well and in all sincerity do not wish any bad luck or misfortune to any investors, whether they consider me a muppet or not.
Can we all just concentrate on keeping ahead of the crowd and getting QRF over the line, as for you Idigo I have watched your posts for several years now and have respect for you, who knows one day we will get to meet. Everybody posting at the moment are doing so to learn or on the other hand teach, we all need to increase our knowledge and who knows by helping each other we could well be ahead of the crowd when the next bounce happens, I sincerely hope so.
If anybody should profit from what could well be an incredible few years it would make sense to be those that have supported the QRF dream and board. I will keep posting my muppet posts with the hope that at least they create discussion, I certainly learn from them and now have a very good insight into what I invested in all of this years ago.
I sincerely wish you all well. ..... Muppet ??
Apologies DPS, you an I are about the same age and certainly did not want to upset you or anybody else on here and I also am a big supporter of QRF and have been for years so hope you don't think otherwise.
But just took a look at this which is interesting as wondered just how much Glycerine there could be available, quite a bit it seems...
Typical plant sources include soybeans or palm. Animal-derived tallow is another source. Approximately 950,000 tons per year are produced in the United States and Europe; 350,000 tons of glycerol were produced per year in the United States alone from 2000 to 2004.[11] The EU directive 2003/30/EC set a requirement that 5.75% of petroleum fuels are to be replaced with biofuel sources across all member states by 2010. It was projected in 2006 that by the year 2020, production would be six times more than demand, creating an excess of glycerol. Glycerol from triglycerides is produced on a large scale, but the crude product is of variable quality, with a low selling price of as low as 2-5 U.S. cents per kilogram in 2011.[12] It can be purified, but the process is expensive. Some glycerol is burned for energy, but its heat value is low.[13] Crude glycerol from the hydrolysis of triglycerides can be purified by treatment with activated carbon to remove organic impurities, alkali to remove unreacted glycerol esters, and ion exchange to remove salts. High purity glycerol (> 99.5%) is obtained by multi-step distillation; a vacuum chamber is necessary due to its high boiling point (290 °C).[7]
Reminds me of an old friend of mine who created thousands of tonnes of manure from his chicken sheds that he never new what to do with, disposal cost a fortune until one day they found it could be burned in power stations and suddenly it had a value.
Hargreaves Landsdown 130,043,795 Interactive Investor Services Limited 107,192,063 Ruudowen Limited 60,812,495 Halifax Share Dealing 54,186,343 Phibatec Limited 51,562,500 Barclays Stockbrokers Limited 44,594,466 Equiniti Shareview 32,805,886
And DP I have been into QRF before you were born, or certainly in nappies, so have been through all of the ups and downs just I do not normally shout about it. Have watched the chat on here for far too long, the BS, those that believe in the MSAR tech, this who have tried to destroy the company, the moaners about management and above all those that criticise when others wish to have an opinion.
Get real my friend and enjoy the ride, there are times when we all need to express ourselves and if getting others to believe in our destination does not appeal to you and getting positive discussion underway instead of constant moans happens to be against your principals go join those on Robin Hood.
So as of today with all of the possibilities on the table QRF is worth a paltry £35,000,000 or thereabouts.
If we get five positive outcomes from the testing that is going on now, if we get one I have no doubt this product will pass all of the hurdles before it and become the fuel of choice on dozens if not more projects around the world for many years to come, and reasonably quickly due to global warming pressures, just how much will the company be worth.
In the USA at the moment any company with promise has a value off the chart and our tar sands project will put our QRF in front of millions of at present unaware investors over there, the share price will not only blow the doors off but demolish the barn
Say the company attains a value of a mere five billion dollars, or three and a half billion U.K. pounds, a pittance in US company valuations, that would give us a share price of around three pounds. Correct me if I am wrong?
What is to stop QRF being bought out if MSC, or any of the projects for that matter, announce successful trials and take up the roll out of MSAR throughout its fleet which would be the springboard into an incredible opportunity for all LTH here.
No way would I want to be forced to take a paltry 50p or less having hung in here for so many years, what is to stop a buy out by say BP or any other large conglomerate or some billionaire somewhere in the world, and there are hundreds of potential candidates, and taking away our just rewards.
Of course The trials with MSC etc. could fail and the shares would be worth a pittance but let’s look on the upside ??
Who would make the decision to sell. A great many shares are owned on here by institutions who would be happy to take a good profit and get on with their lives but small individual investors like us would as always be s*** on from a great height. If there is a takeover attempt how many shares would somebody have to buy to take over control and force us to hand over our shares at far below their potential.
https://www.energyandcapital.com/articles/how-president-biden-is-single-handedly-saving-the-oil-industry/98258
Shouldn't be a problem Indigo, just make sure wherever it is has a landing pad or is near to an airport, I could always use the Jet I guess. How about Monaco.
jeeeeze thought I would get away with that but just looked again and it's going to be another blue on blue day - me hopes.
Where are we going to hold the £1.00 party, could just be out of lockdown when that happens so need to begin the planning :-)
Near to Norwich for me....
Morning all, Just noticed the largish drop in the SP this morning on what looks like quite a few small sells, amazing how a few small sells can shift the market and then as I am all sure you are aware the debacle or brilliance behind the GameStop share moves over the past few days. If we were to all get together maybe on a different private platform and decided to sell say 1000 shares apiece over an hour or two it would cause a significant drop in the QR share price. We could all then fill our boots on cheap shares before the expected moonshot. Just a thought...... and no I am not Elon Musk :-)
Did not realise the options that were hanging above their heads, great news.
Just had this sent to me.
http://www.tradearabia.com/news/IND_377963.html
Ahhhh online schooling. :-)
Mind you a bit late for my age.