contrarian31 Jan 2018 12:36
I'll be the contrarian again against another of the standard responses of we would be in a depression without QE and fake low interest rates. No we would not. What happened should have been allowed to happen and then a recovery would have occurred. Actually the recession caused something very good and positive. It resulted in a substantial and needed decrease in housing prices which were in a bubble. What were the central banker's actions? Printing money for 10 years and throwing it out to home loans causing ridiculous home prices worldwide, people who have no business spending the percentage of their income they do for housing, and paper wealth for families. If the cost to borrow wasnt artificially reduced by these jackals, mortgages would understandably require proper financial strength to qualify for, and house prices wouldnt be sitting at a level where a massive percentage of the population can't even afford a house if they had to buy one today in their own city. And of course youll tell me the benefits, look at all the equityyyy home owners have now! Equity does nothing. If youre living in a house worth 800K and youre not moving, that 800K does NOTHING. It benefits basically nobody in broader society. And banks become distribution points for government printed 'low interest'. There is not even a real business there anymore because there is a basically zero interest rate. If rates were normalized to any standard level in the past 50 years and not this mess they created, then yes a mortgage may cost a little more but the benefits to society are that banks have a profit motive, they lend out money normally, and it goes to all kinds of economic growth interests. Loans for businesses, etc. Instead of sitting in a supersized mortgage bought using fake too easily available money paying back basically no interest which benefits noone. But you have a 800K house right? ;-) Good on ya.