Member Info for CHRI5P

LSE is doing the same as Google and claiming the price is down to 0.12 when it is still up. Never, trust google for a share price.

Sell price now up and lots of buys - this week could be the biggest push for GLR since December 2020!

The MM's dropped the price to get some interest and buyers came back - this is a good start - current price unchanged.

Myles being paid 50% in shares is actually very good it suggests that he still believes. I remember EUA directors being paid in shares for 4 years before they multi-bagged by 100 times. EUZ in my opinion is priced to fail and the resources we have are not being acknowledged because if they were we would be worth more than 3.5p. This does not mean we will fail but that is what the SP is saying via the arm chair PI's many of whom have lost money on EUZ and not willing to invest. These arm chair PI's are not convinced that we will get a partner and a dilutive placing is around the corner, hence if we get a partner we will multi-bag. However, we have to keep proving up the project and making it worth more. We are de-risking the exploration but we are yet to de-risk the funding and that is required as soon as possible.

I have been in the sun all day on the beach and have just listened to the interview. Without a doubt we can see which of his companies Colin favours and is most excited about. To say that we have so much cash and don't require placings even with all the drilling and without the Glenover money coming in November is just astonishing. Today could be the beginning of a major re-rating and to finish on a high is so positive with no pull backs, high volume, suggests a lot, lot more to come this week.

loses worth £10,000,000

Bricks the value will be based on what can be shown is in the ground, the 3 year average price and the estimated cost and ease of getting the resource to the market. Historic costs are irrelevant because the company might have wasted money which BB used to say and I agree with when considering the admin costs. Although, the losses in them self would be worth £10,000 to go against future profits. All in my opinion. So Grappa's idea of selling as a shell company for 10p a share might sound plausible for the tax savings that could be made?

j74 agree with your moan on PR from the company when you compare with other AIM Explorers. Hillside I disagree with you and what WHI are saying makes perfect sense. WHI are saying that EUZ is a multi bagger in their opinion and the investment community are not seeing the full picture. Quite often in AIM exploration the value of the company via the SP is completely out of odds with the actual value - the market is mispricing massively (up or down) and when you take into account that the majority of the investors are arm chair PI's looking for soundbites it is easy to see why. We have no positive PR and so we are valued to fail which might actually happen but if we start to see a possible mine being a possibility even if we give 75/80% of the mine away like GGP did we will see the SP multi-bag but for that we need a partner to fund the rest of the research to the definitive feasibility study (DFS). By the way I am not saying that this is a given but having an RNS like we had on Wednesday is an important step towards that goal. Shed I am not saying we would give up 75% but even if we did it would still be a positive outcome for the SP.

Great interview.

Just having a good update is enough for me. These are the sort of RNS's we require to get noticed. All very good for me.

The last 2 sells are so close to the mid price they might actually be delayed buys.

Sell price back to 3p!

The majority of JV's are agreed before a PFS. The mining licence is usually given between the PFS and BFS/DFS. Most AIM exploration companies need a bigger partner to get the PFS/Mining License/BFS/DFS done and we are well set for the JV but nothing is a given.

More information already known in the SP from T O D. Nothing new just out of date nonsense. Directors buying big on the announcement of the interims is the real news and the short squeeze will be big. Shares have started to rise back and the 10 year treasuries are well up this month. Once the shorts actually realize JUP is not going bust they will need to buy back the shares. 11th August the shorts will need to fork out 7.9p which will hurt them massively.

To keep the dividend the same shows confidence and at 60p the company would be on a 20% dividend rate which would only happen if the company is going bust and everyone knows it. So T O D is full of BS. Yes the shorts are in charge at the moment but there will be a huge short squeeze soon and we will rise 50% short-term. Long-term we could go to the wall but I expect JUP to be taken over or a strong recovery. Jupiter is also famous for value investments and this might be back in favour.

Directors tend to want options when they know what is coming. This is amazing news and EUA directors did exactly the same thing. They might not be able to buy on the open market but they can give themselves options which are well out of the money which MM relayed to. Something really big is on the cards and I am extremely excited that GLR is by far my largest holding.

I think this was a realistic update. However, stating that we need more cash to get to the DFS like a hundred other AIM exploration miners is stating the absolute bleeding obvious. The cash would always run out but when you take into account that very little new exploration as been done since the placing, the much lower management costs and the grant money I think we still have time before the release of much needed updates. I am still hopeful for funding to be found to get us to DFS and then that risk will have gone and 11.7p will look like a pittance in comparison. However, a lot of people knock Shed but they have been saying for months it is all about the funding to BFS and de-risking. I am very happy with the 11.7p share price when you take into account the required funding being needed to get to DFS.

Massive

I agree shed - mets done, new JORC and an higher SP then JV and I can retire.

Hello BrickSA, I know I have been the only voice saying this but I have always thought it was bizarre that we only had one project. What usually happens is that the 2 companies would take the asset to mining (Torai) and once the mine is ongoing then you get an IPO or the larger partner buys out the smaller one. So the fact still remains and what I have been saying since October is what does EUZ do if we get a JV? The company will need to be still ongoing because of the partnership so a new project is an absolute must. Any money we might get for the JV (and there quite often is) could not be given out has a dividend due to us having no accumulated profit just a huge loss.