Member Info for Chipstacker

To follow up from my post yesterday, if anyone would like to donate some time and energy to the legal challenge in the UK, please e-mail our (currently small) team on:

info at cineworldshareholders dot com

Thanks

Poorinvestor, Mr. Kioto, just to prevent any duplication of efforts, I wanted to flag that this is currently happening (via the ad-hoc shareholder group who contested the reorganisation plan in the US). The FCA are also aware of the case. Obviously there are no guarantees regarding any form of positive outcome.

I'm interested to know, too. I asked the same question on the Evraz Telegram group, and was met with silence. Has everyone disappeared? : )

Https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/cineworld-bosses-secure-near-35-mln-exit-payout-ft-2023-06-16/

This link doesn't require subscription:

https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/cineworld-bosses-secure-near-35-mln-exit-payout-ft-2023-06-16/

Is this good, or bad?

JohnNth, give it a break. You're either a virgin, or a divorcee (or possibly both).

Lots of new dockets have appeared on the kroll website: https://cases.ra.kroll.com/cineworld/Home-DocketInfo

Anyone here fluent in legalese and willing to decipher the latest?

Cheers

Strength in numbers, and all that :)

Ianharding (or another poster) - please can you ping a link to the article you reference?

Apologies if i've failed to spot it somewhere obvious (or if it was initially posted by someone I've filtered, lol)

Thanks

Shave, it's insightful, reasonable, and intelligent comments like this that keep me here. Thanks, and well said.

Interesting; do you have a source or link, please?

Lol, Cineworld has hammered home the truth of Warren Buffet's sage advice: "If you're not willing to own a stock for 10 years, don't even think about owning it for 10 minutes" : )

Makes sense, cheers :)

Anyone notice that? GAW, AML, Greggs etc. Sorry to derail. Any idea of cause?

Apols if already known; for info, it looks like there's been an amendment to the case hearing dates:

https://cases.ra.kroll.com/cineworld/

I agree that Cine has a lot of pressing issues in the short-term, but I'm unsurprised by the increased revenue forecasts; last night I was taking a look through the list of Marvel's Phase 4, 5 and 6 movies being released over the next few years. I expect a number of these will get close to, or even surpass, a billion dollars at box office. That's a lot of money going to CINE, and lenders will likely be quite aware of this.

See below for reference:

Phase 4: https://www.cineworld.co.uk/static/en/uk/blog/marvel-phase-four-upcoming-movies-in-order-of-release
Phase 5: https://www.cineworld.co.uk/static/en/uk/blog/marvel-phase-5-movies-you-can-expect-to-see
Phase 6: https://www.cineworld.co.uk/static/en/uk/blog/marvel-movie-news-revealed-at-san-diego-comic-con-2022

It's not my area of expertise, but on balance, it sounds like a good deal, no? The judge sounds committed to seeking a good deal for CINE. He clearly knows his stuff: https://2021.wrdic.org/speakers-sessions/keynotes/marvin-isgur/

Thanks Warren, cheers for checking in

Ian, apols again if I'm being dense, but what difference to volatility does it make if a stock is listed on AIM as opposed to the FTSE?