RE: Tweets from Brad27 Apr 2024 09:47
I agree Dr I don't think anyone has an issue over the resource or the project at Anza. I would wager most analysts believe it to be a good project in a world class post code. Most people's issue come from the management team and a question mark over financing. I think they are fair concerns after the last couple years. The people who are bullish on this know this has potential to be a good resource in the future and can see that the company has started to turn a corner. I have to second that the constant put downs of the Orosur directors must annoy them and the continual disparaging of them just picking up a wage etc. I'm not discounting that to be the case, plenty aim companies seem like that but to be honest I get a feeling Brad is a geology purist and hoped that the project would have been further along. Quite clear to see that c&m hurt him and his reputation took a battering after that. I can't say I was impressed by management at that point in time for instance, and for me, the management team still have to do more. However, one thing that is certain is, if Anza is coming 100pc back to Orosur (I believe it will), the management team will have down remarkably well to achieve that and would deserve a pat on the back and kudos for that. It looks like m&a activity is starting to heat up, BHP/ Anglo this time. Of course we don't know the exact ins and outs of the LOI and the deal that looks to be struck, which by now will be with legal teams but I just keep coming back to commercially sensitive information which could mean a number of things. What better way to kick off the "new Orosur' by dropping an absolute bomb. Read between the lines.....you don't pull all your resources to Colombia unless you mean business in that location. They'll be in the talking mood that is for sure.