RE: RE: Annual accounts20 Feb 2019 22:28
nomblungu,
Now you know he resorts to insults. Just read his history. Funny thing is he claims he owns SCLP shares with an average of 12.5 and will top up between 4/5p when the liquidators are called in? Staggering.
As you remember me saying he is the only one who mentions SCLP, there are many dual holders on both BBs and there is no war as he claims. A man made war perhps.
Just find val-ju and others your constant name calling of anybody with an alternate view is still labelled a troll. I have traded this twice, a while back so apparantly that means i cannot post here until i agree with everything val ju posts. If not i am a paid troll.
Back to .75/.80 and you guys are deciding which Pharma needs you. Perhaps you might agree with me as i said a few weeks ago a placing at .40 first week in March is more likely if indeed you can raise at all. I find your unprecedented love for the share remarkable given the evidence and the history, and your desire to have a BB that strictly agrees with only positive posters.
IMHO you need to start welcoming alternative views, and dismiss them if you disagree, he who knows everything knows nothing.
Again, we all wish that VAL has the answers to all cancer problems, cancers of all types, there are just over 700, and in lung cancer alone there are over 40 types. Why not recognise VAL do not have all the answers, Checkpoint Inhibitors work to varying degrees on just 25% of patients it is prescribed too, hence the need for combination trials not binary options. Does it not concern you that for such a wonder drug VAL has fallen 98% and more recently the pump up 43% has all but gone back to the levels of today for a drug so special?
So in the recent pump, many more investors are stranded 40% down, as i said confirmation bias is an investors worst friend, that is why you insult what you call trolls, so as not to put off investors whilst selling your own shares. Shabby isn"t it.
Lets see what does happen in the next few weeks, income is desperately needed so a deal must be struck in the next two weeks, and you really believe that will happen and make out there is a Pharma war to buy VAL as well.A bit like Corbyn, repeat something long enough and eventually some will believe you, val ju it is my belief that your posts put off even those that hold in much the same way as fourteen and uncanny did. Desperate times, desperate measures. Hope i am wrong for your sakes.
Outside funding for small pharmas like VAL and SCLP are not a divine right and very hard to coclude due to the financial restraints and shortage of patients in trials, i conclude a deal would be completed by now if a Pharma was interested.