Member Info for CHELSEA7

For 13k

Well we know the dosing regimes and what patients meet the qualifications necessary to enrol for trial. My experience of trials is that though advertisedare actually fully enrolled, much like we see job vacancies advertised but already filled.

Will take 120k at 7p

First time we have seen the dosing regime.........isn"t it??

Good spot Steve, patients just recruiting in Nottingham??

Shows how sick these patients are...........""Patient has a life expectancy of more than 3 months"".

Last two big buys from our buyer..........

04/09/2019 08:59 100,000 7.425
04/09/2019 08:59 269,185 7.425

SP moving back to that level to accomadate more IMHO. Trade just after RNS, 300K were bought after that up to mid 8s. Retail

Agree wholeheartedly Inanaco

""Its almost like you are attempting to down play every move scancell makes ..""

Bermuda is not like that IMHO, but too many are..

Tick Down 7/7.80

Our 50k seller sold again, expecting our buyer to strike soon.

Morning Guys.

Well the BB noticed it, it was a 103k sell at 7.72

Buys 34k

Sells 124k

From CH to yesterdays news.............................

Chief executive Dr Cliff Holloway said: "We are pleased to be able to report significant progress on our monoclonal antibody pipeline, having only licensed the technology into the company just over a year ago from the University of Nottingham.

"Our first collaboration and evaluation agreement with one of the major players in the antibody development field is a significant achievement in such a short period of time and we believe our novel AvidiMab enhanced cell killing platform has broad partnering potential."

What"s your opinion and first thoughts on this collaboration?

True Bermuda, when we spoke last week i menioned though it is entirely possible that the money raised, now in collaboration will ensure the funding of all the Clinical Trials and Expenditure in the known SCIB and MOD platforms. That would be one heck of a boost for us.

Yeah likewise, hopefully there might be an EGM in the not too distant future, lol.

Very quiet today, was hoping to see a bigger volume, let alone hard to sell any quantity, perhaps the MMs have a couple of trades to post before the close.

I feel we are talking at cross purposes here, really can"t see where a problem exists TBH. Certainly none from my end. Onwards, forwards.

Afternoon chester, very true words, and yes I am really looking forward it. As I said I missed 3 out of the last 4, and for all the good work done by Botski in recording it, I just prefer to be there to gauge how holders react to certain news and how the BOD are reacting in conducting it.

There are so many areas where news and updates could come, delighted with this latest news, feel we have another item of news to come and just have a couple of questions for Martin Diggle and Cliff Holloway. Always feel better putting a face to a name. Much talk here about sentiment being poor, I think that is true but only because a couple of posters here seem hell bent on creating that,the few people i talk too are all looking forward to hearing more clarity in the plans we have for ow and future, if not I would say a bit of re-assurance, given it was not so long abo we saw 16m shares traded at 3p. Will you be attending chester, would be good to meet up?

"""Dracula1

Posts: 1,285

Price: 7.75

No Opinion

RE: DraculaToday 13:00
14th Aug Post Headed Torquay. 1st sentence. No IMHO. Waste of time replying to your posts. This Is the last one AIMOO""

???? Dracula what has your post to TF on 14/8 got to do with me asking you to back up your post to me???

So your post starts ""What makes you think that anything you say on Sclp Is correct.""...............seems to me the feud we cleared up is anything but.

I will leave others to decide if my input (with the best will in the world) is helpful to them, going by a few posts on here and my inbox it helps quite a few. It has taken me a very long time to rediscover myself and rebuild the confidance i have, even the ability to understand this share, so in answer to your question............ ""What makes you think that anything you say on Sclp Is correct."", well a fair bit actually, and I certainly won"t be putting myself out to answer or comment on your posts. Seems the sceptre of VAL will never go away. Shame. Take care.

Scousemark, i agree and would add that who is buying is not actually the issue, he was just discrediting the FACT that i had identified this buyer a while ago, even down to the times the sells and buys would come. Not lowering myself to his level buy yesterday I believe the 269k buy and the 100k buy we posted at exactly the same time, as indeed many of the previous buys have been or within seconds of the sell being posted. It doesn"t take a genius to accept that trades following a daily pattern and reaction to the dummy prices are from the same stable, but again what is peoples problem, of course it can be a different buyer, the point is we as a BB have recognised them, and it does go someway to answering a few questions that have been posed lately covering a few items. ATB buddy

Dracula, glad you eventually replied to me. Everything I post is IMHO, and FACT is not a word I would use lightly. Could you repost where I said that, and regardless I would apologise IF I said that.

IF I said it was not holding up the trial, then I believe I was right. As I have posted a few times we got the Approval here on APRIL 25TH, give a day or too, I believe we would have got on with a number of items needed to begin trials, and at that point decided to wait no longer for the IND and withdraw the IND application so as to start the trial here. That being the case, if it is the case then the US holdup did not as things worked out cause the trial here to be delayed.

I didn"t even think for a moment that had upset you, again if it did I apologise, as you say it is water under the bridge. I would however like to see my reply that said that. Yes I do have a fair few opinions, not afraid to post them either, but for all the ones that turn out to be correct, it seems people comment on the one that was wrong. Again, it could have been misconstrued what I said on this occasion so I would appreciate you posting it, it could easily have been on my mind that it wasn"t Svancells fault for the hold up. Importantly after all we discussed a while ago, i would and have never ignored you, or just been difficult because it was you who posted it. ATB