RE: Another Great Article/mAbs7 Sep 2019 14:33
Lol, yeah, wish they would disappear rather than hide. I wouldn"t mind every day TF challenges whatever I post, whilst thanking Knowlesi for his excellent contribution. I posted this to TF on 30th August 20.15, a waste really he never listens............
but Torquay can you not see what is happening, for a company deserving derisory questions as if they were idiots by people who do not know the half, and for all their love of the science ££the science will see us through"", lol, are perhaps missing all the sciences we are working on. Does it make you feel better to have no faith in the BOD, the same BOD who have taken us here and received many validations, and is it just possible they know how far they need to go to get maximum shareholder rewards? The Glycansand Mabs alone could fund us through Immunabody amd Moditope through many human trials whilst the company continues to grow, and for anybody concerned about the next raising of funds, does it not reassure you that Vulpes know exactly what is needed and when subject to no commercial deals pending data.?
I guess I am lucky, I listen to what Inanaco, Crumbs and Ray discuss and research from that what I find interesting, rather than finding fault with every post. Very rarely do I debate with them they are better researched than me. However the posts that interest me most are the ones discussing the Oncology Market, and it is my belief Lindy is right up there with the best as our latest third platform suggests.
Dracula, just seen your post, I am so sorry to ask you a question, as a member of team DAMP I should know better. So TF, Knowlesi and Dracula on permenant filter, your contributions to this BB are non existant, and for all the talk of ""freedom of speech"" you can"t answer a question between you. Night you guys.