Member Info for chattty

You should be able to buy shares via the Halifax or for that matter any other platform,as their (TRAF)suspension was lifted yesterday although it may take a day or two for Halifax to reinstate trading facilities.

If they don't ring Halifax up and ask to put through to complaints by phone not using the autobot system can we help etc.,

Not expecting news until after the new year, around March April time.

Also with the potential value that DP have in hand,a distinctive possibility exists for a clean take out bid for the entire company buoyed by the company being chased by several competing majors.

So it is wait and see.

Just hit the 'Report post' icon ,eventually such posts will be removed.

The company's products, particularly focused on addressing MRSA, other post-operative infections, and chronic illness following antibiotic use, have the potential to generate annual sales exceeding £2 billion. It's noteworthy that the term used is "annual" sales, indicating a substantial revenue potential.

Destiny Pharma's drugs are strategically designed to reduce antibiotic use, accelerate recovery for the sick, and contribute to cutting healthcare costs. The emphasis on cost savings in healthcare aligns well with the priorities of the NHS.

As an illustrative example of what's possible, the text mentions GW Pharma, a cannabis group based in Cambridge, with sales of $400 million? a year which experienced a remarkable 25-fold increase in value in less than a decade. This surge occurred from its Nasdaq market floatation in 2013 at $8.90 per share to its acquisition for $220 per share just eight years later.

I often wonder why individuals stay invested in a share in which they have no faith at all. After all, it was their decision to invest, presumably based on research and an understanding of the associated risks, along with the potential for financial loss. Once invested, the responsibility for failing to exit earlier at a profit or to minimize losses falls squarely on them.

Examining the document below, it can be seen it includes past records when Apt had almost £10 million in cash (Dec '21) before the company went under, led by a Bricklayer. There's a sense of poor selective ramping, as at no point does it mention that today's contracts are all short-term which means they have to be continually replaced, with the last few having no great value, contrary to the usual practice where the company states their contract value. So, the facts presented are somewhat misleading, especially when falsely using old accounts to present a great picture.

Surface exploration giving results of 1% copper is excellent especially over the large size of the footprint, Just one high grade copper zone is 1.5 x .5 Km in size.

Analyzing the surface exploration results showing 1% copper,apart from Silver and gold

it is promising specifically as it is in a mining friendly jurisdiction with all the required infrastructure in place,although the find is nascent in nature.

As a rule of thumb, open pit mining becomes economically viable when the cost to process ore is around $10 per tonne. In cases where the ore grade is more than double that, at $20 per tonne, it's considered economically favorable.

Considering that 1% of a metric tonne is 22 pounds, and given that today's copper is valued at nearly $4.00 per pound, the total value of copper in one metric tonne of ore would be 22 pounds which equals $88.

So making it economically feasible and highly profitable for open cast mining as results continue to be proved up the target will be disposal to a JV or similar.

The highest content pt I know of is 8% in Canada .The average mine rate of copper being produced in the world today is generally way under 1%

Also GMET amongst its other assets has its Tungsten Pilot Mountain project already under major fast track and grant applications to the various US.GOV various Bureaus dealing with critical minerals.

With regard to the PM project it is almost unbelievable that the given US intention is to have the mine up and running within 3 to 4 years.

Golden Metal holds a 100% interest in the Garfield Project through its wholly-owned Nevada operating company, Golden Metal Resources LLC. A 2% Net Smelter Return Royalty ("NSR Royalty") Interest, of which 1% can be bought back at any time for US$1,000,000, is payable to Sunrise Resources plc (LON:SRES). The NSR Royalty covers the original Garfield Project claims as well as a 1 mile radius outside of those claims which covers roughly half of the current 'High-Grade Zone' footprint.

The Consensus Recommendation for Destiny Pharma is consistently reported as 1.00 for the period leading up to November 30, 2023. A consensus recommendation of 1.00 generally indicates a strong buy or buy recommendation from analysts.

Additionally, the Upside (Analyst Target) for Destiny has shown varying percentages over the fiscal years, with the most recent reported at 367.7% for FY2018, 481.4% for FY2019, 338.0% for FY2020, 252.4% for FY2021, and 472.0% for FY2022. These percentages represent the potential upside as projected by analysts' target prices compared to the current market price.

The Fair Value target for Destiny Pharma is consistently reported at £2.79 for the period leading up to November 30, 2023, and Price Target Count remains at 3 for the same period.

Here's a summary of the analyst price targets for Destiny Pharma:

Metric High Low Mean

Analyst Price Target Count 3 3 3

Analyst Price Target High £2.85 £0.65

Analyst Price Target Low £0.65 £0.65

Analyst Price Target Mean £2.10 £2.10 £2.10

The consistency in the Consensus Recommendation and the Fair Value, along with varying Upside percentages, makes for a positive market opinion regarding Destiny Pharma.

The situation in Côte d'Ivoire presents a difficult backdrop for investment, given the lingering effects of the armed conflict that ended in 2011. Root causes such as ethnic and regional tensions, land disputes, corruption, and impunity continue to pose risks. Additionally, the country faces a terrorist threat, particularly in the northern regions bordering Mali and Burkina Faso.

The mention of a 12 parts per million (ppm) gold find by Mr. Bell is noted, but raises concerns about the practical implications. Expensive exploratory work is necessary, and the challenges of operating in a region with security risks further complicate the feasibility of such ventures.

Mr. Bell has shown a continuous high-risk attitude towards the use of shareholder funds which reflects a concern about the management's decision-making and risk-taking approach in the context of the complex and potentially hazardous environment in Côte d'Ivoire.

Simply put this project will eventually end alongside many of Mr Bells other high risk investments, stranded on the road to nowhere.

The company relies heavily on short-term contracts for its primary income source, necessitating a continual focus on selling and renewing contracts. Despite optimism, the company is struggling to meet income expectations.

The challenge stems from a history of significant failures overseen by the previous Board of Directors. Despite recent changes in leadership, key contributors to past failures remain on the new BOD, impacting overall performance and results.

Has anyone a realistic idea of the amount of money each of the expected deals could bring into the company?

Assuming all the researched data is correct then Bell and the BOD have to answer for giving shareholders incorrect information designed to lift the share price.

They could of course defend themselves by indicating it was not their fault the wrong information was put up unless of course they are buying in just 200 tons of ore and no more,perhaps a one off transaction? which again is useless to shareholders waiting for the sp to move forward.

My understanding of mining is quite limited, but from what I gather, the drilling string pipework has been recovered without being replaced by production pipework or does the wireline log take place prior to production pipework being put in place.. This absence makes me wonder if there hasn't been a successful resource strike.

Would appreciate enlightenment from those who understand.

Thanks.

A question came up about Teathers on Telegram. To provide some context, Teathers was quoted on the London Stock Exchange (LSE) but faced difficulties. A group of High Net Worth (HNW) shareholders came together and supported the company from their own pockets for approximately four years.? This support continued until the company was presumably to be exclusively utilized for their UEE projected Initial Public Offering (IPO).

IF that is the case why should any of POWs funds be used to pay off outstanding debts in addition to the purchasing cost for the remains of Teathers.

I do not know if Sean Wade is one of the group of HNWs mentioned.

It is possible the group of HNW shareholders, in supporting Teathers, may potentially face some sort of claim, perhaps on an individual basis especially if certain shareholders were excluded from benefiting, leaving them with losses.

Corporate law is a minefield of inventive minds.

So much under the radar that many trading platforms would only accept sell trades to a maximum of the NMS of 150,000 although using a broker did indicate a Millon + could be sold at silly money.

This the result of "SW Selfish"attitude in concentrating on his Uranium IPO and leaving NBGT etc., in the background. not a good result of his changing the policies and direction of POW as a whole which have resulting in the AI predictions of values and not only as often stated due to the mkts assessment of values.

Those buying now,subject to mkt recovery should make profits whilst LTH holders are left high and dry until recovery starts as demand outstrips available supplies.

It appears that, in light of recent increases seen in buying interest, a revised target is needed. So a target range of £1.50 to £2.00 is within reach, contingent in fluctuations on trading profits being realized. This assessment is made without factoring in any additional news or updates.

I don't disagree with the expressed view points especially when considering long term holds - nevertheless I still think its a stock for trading profits.

Probably worth a trade but the basics are little news until the company completes the new feasibility study.

Also the company has within hours of listing shafted new shareholders with instant dilution by raising further funds thereby laying the foundations for mistrust.

With regard to POW Paul Johnson decided to part with Bell a while back due to the significant pushback they were facing.

Bell really did not like being pushed out of POW.

PJ also resigned from POW for health reasons. It was a tough call, but he had to prioritize his well-being.