Member Info for chase1

@BobbyBagger & Co, kread, WaitAMinute, Wolfe jr, big beasty etc… you lot keep pumping yourselves up like some almighty “beasty”, but everyone here knows exactly what your circus looks like: months of fear‑mongering, doom posts on repeat, and the moment reality kicks in you vanish… only to crawl back next year under yet another alias, pretending nobody spots you. So let’s cut the nonsense: which BB name will you be hiding behind next year when you start talking another stock down? Go on, tell us, I’ll happily set aside some cash for your theatre act next year. All that noise… at a volume of only 36,852,257 shares. Pathetic. Night‑time drama, zero substance. Night!

@PositiefMind89 - I get your point, everyone has a different budget. But that’s exactly why the question matters. If someone claims they’ll ‘buy in big’ at 0.30–0.35, it’s perfectly reasonable to ask what ‘big’ actually means. There’s a world of difference between 10,000 shares and 10 million, and that context helps put statements into perspective. And just to be clear, please don’t tag me as ‘@achtervolging1’ in future replies. No need for that. Also, I wasn’t asking you, PositiefMind89. My question was directed at Lucky8s. Oh, and just to throw this in, I noticed a few people were happily tossing their tickets out the window again today. For clarity: that wasn’t me. I like to keep mine where they belong.

If you’re planning to buy at 0.30, 0.35, fair enough, but out of curiosity, how many shares are you actually talking about? Always interesting to see the scale behind these statements.

@BobbyBagger & Co

“Interesting how many extreme opinions are flying around here, often from people with barely one or two HE1 posts. One side shouts ‘rocket’, the other side shouts ‘bankrupt’, yet almost no one backs anything up with facts, data, or actual company information. I’m invested here, but I don’t base my decisions on forum drama — not on rampers who call every dip a ‘launchpad’, and not on bashers who declare the end of the company every time there’s a red candle. Anyone posting just to be proven right adds very little. I prefer to focus on concrete matters: funding, partners, operational updates, and real progress. “And just to wrap it up — BobbyBagger, Offler, Kes59 and knobbystyles are now on mute. Life’s too short to read the same recycled noise.”

Analysis of the 17 April 2026 LTIP Announcement The RNS confirms three essential points:

Management is being compensated very generously through options and nil‑cost awards.

These awards involve no personal financial risk.

None of this changes the fact that directors have not bought shares on the open market for years.

Broomtree’s right, every time Sandyman brings up that ‘ship’, it’s already taking on water. Some narratives only stay afloat because people keep repeating them.

7300 & 4244 posts… you’d think at least one meaningful contribution would’ve slipped in somewhere along the way. But hey, someone has to keep the archive of useless posts filled.

Broomtree - everyone in the last raise being underwater isn’t a ‘fact’, it’s just basic maths on a volatile AIM stock. It tells us nothing about the asset, the process, or the next RNS — it only tells us the entry price of a group of investors. Calling that ‘simple reality’ is just a neat way of pretending it means something bigger than it does. Reality is this: until HE1 updates the market, everything else is interpretation, not fact.

Amazing. According to the deramp squad we’re heading for the 30s, yet someone keeps buying million‑share chunks.

Must be a very confused buyer.

The spread looks tiny, but percentage‑wise it’s wide enough for them to steer the price — that’s why they (MM 's) pull the same trick every day.

Manipulation? Call it whatever you want — but this is not a natural price movement.

You’re right that nothing is confirmed until it’s RNS’d — that’s always the case. But the absence of an RNS does not mean the absence of activity. In a farm‑out phase, the early steps are never announced. Here’s the distinction Powerboat was making: Companies do not RNS the signing of NDA’s (Non‑Disclosure Agreements). They do not RNS who enters the data room (all project data for review). They do not RNS the start of due diligence (checking everything before committing millions). They only RNS something once the farm‑out (bringing in a partner who pays and participates) process reaches a binding stage. That’s standard across the sector. Silence is normal because the early stages are confidential by design. The broker appointment doesn’t contradict that, brokers are often brought in after initial interest to formalise and structure the process. It doesn’t mean nothing happened before; it just means the process moved to a stage where a broker becomes useful. So yes, nothing is “proven” until an RNS lands, but the lack of an RNS about NDA’s or data‑room access is not evidence that they don’t exist. Those steps are simply never disclosed.

What Post 12:19 described isn’t “hope” — it’s the standard process every farm‑out goes through. The current silence is exactly what you get once NDA’s are in place and multiple parties are inside the data room. That has nothing to do with the share price. The facts are: NDA’s legally require complete silence - data‑room analysis by major players takes weeks - each party runs its own due diligence A farm‑out process realistically takes 13–26 weeks, never just a few weeks. That isn’t hope, that’s simply how these transactions work across the sector. The share price tells you nothing about what is happening inside the data room. AIM microcaps move on sentiment, not on internal progress. The Colorado contract showed the same: fundamental steps don’t always translate into immediate price support. You’re right that the final outcome is binary: either a deal is signed, or it isn’t. But the current silence is not an indicator of direction, it’s just part of the process.

Strong buying coming in — hold tight, especially if you’re doubting or getting played by the boom‑shakers. 🕶️

Profit calculation for a full MARE SICULUM tanker (1.16 million barrels)

Using your updated cost assumption of $30 per barrel, and keeping all other inputs the same: Bonny Light sale price: $122/bbl - Hedge loss: $10/bbl - Net realized price: 122 − 10 = $ 112 / bbl Cost per barrel: $30

Volume: 1,160,000 barrels 1️⃣ Profit per barrel 112 − 30 = $ 82/bbl

2️⃣ Total profit for a full tanker 82 × 1,160,000 = $95,120,000

✅ Total profit with $30/bbl cost: ≈ $95.12 million per full MARE SICULUM cargo Summary (very short) At $30/bbl cost, each full tanker earns $95.1M. The five cargoes (March–July) together earn (5) ≈ $439.6M.

Lower cost assumptions push profits above $100M per tanker.

Thanks also AI

Funny how you demand “numbers” while those are exactly what a trading update consists of. The well data, the flow tests, the permits, the technical reports - those are the numbers. Anyone claiming it’s all “promises and sentiment” simply hasn’t read the RNS releases. Your car analogy actually proves the opposite of what you think: You don’t buy a car by asking the seller to “give me some numbers”, you look at the technical inspection and the condition reports. That’s exactly what’s happening here — the technical documentation is public and verifiable. A trading update is issued when there is new, material information not when someone gets impatient. Those who understand the available data know what they’re looking at. Those who don’t keep asking for numbers that already exist. 🕶️

Supplement; Outside the Gulf region, closures since 2023 include: Europe: Several major shutdowns (UK, Belgium, Netherlands, Germany).

United States: Multiple permanent closures (Martinez, Convent, Gallup, PES). Canada: Refineries converted to biofuel or idled. Australia: Two major refineries closed; only two remain. Japan & South Korea: Several small refineries shut down due to low margins. Brazil: Older refineries idled or sold.

Russia: 18 refineries knocked offline by drone strikes.

Refinery closures; at least six major refineries outside the Gulf have shut down since 2023 (Grangemouth, Lindsey, Gunvor Antwerp, Gunvor Rotterdam, plus multiple shutdowns in Germany and Scotland, plus 18 Russian refineries disabled by drone strikes. This reduces global refining capacity and boosts demand for West African crude like Tullow’s. Platts Dated Brent is the physical spot price for oil delivered in 10–25 days. It’s usually $10–$25 higher than Brent futures. Tullow sells at PDB while hedges cap only Brent — so Tullow keeps the full PDB premium.

Bezos vs Musk fighting over a bone — something’s leaking here. M9nday 0.61 and only up from there

Thank you for the explanation, T12

RSI(14) 36.36 - Wm%R(14) -100.00 - ? (26 - 6 - 1) ?