RE: Lack of Nuvec collaborations20 Mar 2018 17:35
"...Opinions are all we have at the moment, and you just gave us yours, which is fair enough."
MarcoT, goshhh, now I see our misunderstanding!! You dont see TA as science. That's why!
In the meantime leading investors like Goldman Sachs mostly rely on mathematics. Based on the fact that everything that goes up, will have to come back down at some point.
Whether its your plane landing in Lanzarote, or the Bitcoin landing in reality. These are facts, not opinions.
The BTC had to retrace at some point. N4P had to consolidate after such a steep rise. Only a question of time. And this is what we are trying to resolve. If you were into physics you wouldn't even question this.
Just as the "golden ratio" on which the nature is based upon. A tree grows by a mathematical formula, which is the golden ratio. The pyramids are build based upon the golden ratio. And with a share its "technical divergence" that needs to be in balance, as otherwise it generates certain trading signals.
Where have I seen the facts?
- The 34p wall has become a fact after two or three bounces, which offered you the basis for your next decisions.
- Once the retrace began as from 34p down, it was pointing to a 27p target, which has become a fact.
- The fact in our hands said that if the vital 27p is breached, then substantial retrace ahead. The minute it was breached, this new fact offered you the basis for all further decision.
- The fact is that if 20.25p is breached, then the Sp will retrace to 19.50 and 16.50p.
If for one do not hold any opinion about N4P.
Automated buys are waiting and they will follow the Sp down for as long as it takes, and wait for the rebound to trigger as soon as certain (facts) lines are triggered.
Not opinions. Not betting. I hate betting! But that's just something personal.
Best of luck with your decision based on company facts as well as facts about the main market situation as well as factual mathematical trading patterns.