Member Info for champagnecharlie

Malachi - no, evidently they're not the same thing. Here's the paper (courtesy Sicilian Kan on the advfn board):
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246139

yuyus and malachi - Indeed. From the 2019 interim results announcement on 31/1/2019: "ANGLE is pursuing partnership options for opportunities in the billion dollar non-invasive pre-natal diagnostics market".

To add to what PM01 writes, here's a little bit more history - showing that it was 15 years ago that AGL first acquired an interest in Parsortix and that the focus at that time was foetal testing:
https://www.investegate.co.uk/angle-plc--agl-/rns/new-venture---parsortix-inc/200605040700524094C/

crypt0r - You'll be pleased to know it's not so. On a takeover by share-for-**************, CGT would normally be triggered only when the new shares in the acquiring company are sold: section 135 Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act [TCGA] 1982.
https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/capital-gains-manual/cg52570
#14 (retired)

scotlouie - What you write is a gross misrepresentation, AN was NOT "throwing out a £13 buyout figure". It was a questioner from the public who asked, in terms, "If [xxx] came and offered you £13 per share, how would you react?"

@scotlouie - that's not a 52 week high, that's the highest since August 2005!

Machine: indicative cost $15,600 including sales, distribution, maintenance etc. Indicative "retail" price $50,000 (albeit seemingly negotiable).
Cassette: cost $15, "retail" price $100.
Source: AGL presentation Jan 2021
https://angleplc.com/wp-content/uploads/ANGLE-Presentation-to-Proactive-One2One-Virtual-Forum-21jan21.pdf

Here's another one that may be up for grabs http://www.railjournal.com/index.php/rolling-stock/alstom-to-refurbish-scottish-emus.html It was suggested a while back [yes, I've been lurking for some time] that the Crossrail contract had gone to a competitor. Does anyone have a source for that? To whom? (Who are PEG's main competitors in the rail market, anyway, and what is PEG's USP if they have one?)

Agreed Mike. My point was that it may be unsafe to assume there's much more to come from Norway, at least for the next year or two (or three or four...).

This year's contract with the RNoAF looks very similar to the one mentioned in PEG's interim results for 2006. Quote: "£0.25m countermeasures order from Bell Helicopters for the Norwegian Air Force" That suggests to me that, framework notwithstanding, we perhaps shouldn't hold our breath for any significant reorders in the short term.

@sharethenews: It's better than that. "The Board anticipates securing some additional business during the latter part of this year that is expected to make a contribution to revenues during the second half year. " I'd be looking for H2 turnover of £8m, perhaps more. Even at a paltry 27% gross margin, this would suggest a net profit of £700K for the year is not unattainable.

link removed?? Let's try again, this tiime you'll have to do the links yourselves. https www gov uk /government/collections/mod-finance-transparency-dataset https www gov uk /government/publications/mod-finance-transparency-dataset-financial-year-201415

Further to the very interesting posts by mike30 and others, has anybody yet caught up with this website https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/mod-finance-transparency-dataset and its continuation https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/mod-finance-transparency-dataset-financial-year-201415 ? Details have to be downloaded month by month. If you drill down, there is quite a lot on PEG albeit it's not altogether consistent with chairman's statements in annual and interim reports. If taken at face value, it suggests that PEG billed the MOD £4.029m in the first half of 2014, compared with £1.648m for the whole of 2013, £507K in 2012 and £257K in 2011. Admittedly the £4.029m includes over £3m for "fixed asset under construction", but even so... And it doesn't seem to include much for the RAF. I at least found it fascinating, but please DYOR.