RE: Conference call7 Apr 2015 10:06
Try listening to the whole thing on the website. Thought James came across well and genuine, whereas thought Richards sounded as though he was annoyed that we had the nerve to question the BOD!
All in all satisfied with responses and decision to update pi's on a regular basis now we know that the project is long term.
As posted on advfn
We now know that things have changed considerably since the injection of cash by Greenstone. The concept that Martin had for a quick one trick pony was not what Greenstone had in mind when they offered the 12 millions and it was obviously them that decided through their "contacts" to change the BOD to accomplish these ends. Cash is king atm and we took the cash. Quite rightly imo, but that meant different objectives and perhaps shall we say a more corporate a approach. Bring in the big guns.
The 13 months from issue of licence told the story.
So we have what we have.
I suggest that the 15% reduction in spend has only been achieved by more or less stopping all but the most necessary work on site and spending the last 3 months re evaluating the ground works and way forward. Looks like the "drive" (tunnel) that was going so well was not going so well. Would like to hear more on this. The talk of bringing in a loading shovel makes me think what on earth were they using before? Pretty basic piece of equipment seen in every quarry in the country. But that's by the by.
More tests on the ore to see, with the new more knowledge men aboard, what equipment to purchase once licence is obtained. Sounds sensible to me to optimise production.
So time lines have changed drastically and if we don't get our licence til end of Q2 we will definitely not get into production before Q3 2016 by what has been announced. Application will have been on the Ministry's desk for 12 months by end of this month. Seems to have been a lot of emphasis during the dial up on proving to the Government that it wasn't the intention of the BOD to prove up, get the licence and sell on, but to mine and prove up their intentions in the region. As if they are using Namib to make a statement of intent.
As I said previously, although not a fan of "dial up" as I like to look people in the eye, after listening to it for the first time after it was put on the net I came away with "sounds like they know what they are doing". James came across as someone, for the time being, I can trust to do things right, but he is just one amongst many and it's those on the BOD that hold the sway.
So now the returns we were expecting back then when the EIA was approved and the sp was twice what it is today will if they materialise be some way off. Long term (if you've got long term lol), this is most likely one of the better "bets" on the lousy aim market and yesterday I did show my belief in the future of Namib by adding a few to my already top heavy investment here.
It's become a waiting game. Waiting for the B