RE: 2 months...1 Aug 2025 09:58
I know we have been in discussions for what seems like decades, but i think ffx that although I have always shared your frustration in the way the dismal bod have acted over the years; and have said so , much to the annoyance of some (why max). I do believe that if they are truly in meaningful discussions then nfx suggesting/announcing who those discussions are with, unless previously agreed, would be a bad move for several reasons.
Firstly it would put those discussions and any deal at risk.
Secondly it would give a short term boost as traders jumped aboard.
And thirdly if those discussions broke down the share price would fall to a fraction of what it is today.
And finally I think one could say nfx would go to the wall.
Of course things will have to move with pace from now on in as finances become tight, (again), as another trip to the broker could well be the last.
We I believe have always over the years seen eye to eye on most things that have surpassed over the years with nfx, and been shot down for doing so. Though the proof is in the pudding regarding this company's performance and history doesn't lie.
ATB