Member Info for CF73

Thanks so much again tedoby! For a long time, it seemed that PREM was pushing a project that was just not viable. But from your post, we can place RHA in a proper context. It is also noticeable that there are genuine murmurrings that RHA may well achieve the potential we once believed was possible - and perhaps even more!

Ziggy, have just gone through it again; may be there was a prior meeting before the October date, where it is t be settled, or could simply be a case of lost in translation...

What I do find encouraging is that in the space of a month and a half, we may well be in a position to hear about where we are on those two very critical fronts (arbitration and ADR).

Good luck to all the genuine folks here!

LOLRainbow. Agree that Hope has bitten off more than he can chew, indeed, he may find his self chewing on his own nuts.

...on a par with 'Raiders of the Lost Ark' :-)

It is indeed wretched. Market is absolutely left wide open to abuse and corruption, with no political will do anything about it. As a consequence, it's rigged, really is,

Quite astonishing work tedoby, thank you again!!

Another quite awesome post from tedoby. I thank you sir!

This is a crucial period. We have apparently arbitration hearing that was meant to be happening Oct 2019, and that could've happened already; and ADR by end of Nov 2019.

So, by end of Nov, we should know the result of ADR (if there is to be one) and, potentially, the outcome of the Arbitration.

Now imagine that...

Regdik, always appreciate your posts. I just wanted to concentrate on one element of your last post, where you said,

"By Moles post he has muted that some of the headroom may be offloaded to OMF (might be needed to cover shorts) as a backstop.[1] If Hope was shorting them these would be required to clear the decks so it looks like Hope might leave the shorting crew to their own devices (I hope so).[2]"

[1] If Hope/ OMF do want those shares to cover shorts, there is a question of how clear/ explicit that is possible to be made in the ADR process. I say this as certainly Hope shorting while being on the board is a big no-no and would bring the fiduciary thing back into focus. If he is wanting those shares to cover shorts, he/ they won't be able to make clear why unless between the parties they come to understanding....except that then opens the way for FRR to take this further on the fiduciary element (though FRR may have enough evidence already). If the shorting thing is not out in the open during ADR, then Hope et al need to make clear the reasons for why they believe they are entitled to those shares...

[2] Leaving shorting scrotii to suffer consequences would be great, would love it in fact. However, I do wonder how entangled they all are and whether the shorting scrotii (if they had been colluding heavily) would allow Hope to only save his own 4R53 leaving the scrotii to suffer financial castration? And, as a way-out there onspiracy, ever since the IG under HSBC pay-out of shorts, had wondered if that was some part of the compromise (that payout just seems so bent to me)??

Anyway...

Madp, been processing in my head your earlier post. One aspect I got to agree with, if FRR have irrefutable evidence of YA wrongdoing (which they do) which implicates in very clear terms, then can see why FRR would not want to resolve via ADR. Certainly, they wouldn't be entertaining notions of paying out to Hope et al or coming to any kind of compromise.

The problem for us shareholders is that that is a level of confidence they can readily enjoy which we cannot at the present moment.

AIM is too corrupt and shorting is a heinous practice. If you tread carefully, there is a way through it, but requires building experience, which also comes at a cost.

You can create a pension out of AIM but certainly not recommended you put your pension into it.

Think FRR will come out of it OK in the end, but not going to be fun while it all appears uncertain, best of luck!

Goit, there are a few W A N K E R S out there, this one is perhaps unrivalled.

Madp, thanks for getting back again. Yes, in due course will be interested in hearing about your views on the YA smoking gun idea (I do believe there is good cause for suspicions along this route).

Much appreciated Madp,

Had to translate all of that online. Importantly got this;

"A further hearing on the Frontera arbitration lawsuit will take place in October 2019, according to the Gas and Oil Corporation audit report."

Do we know if this hearing has haopened or when we might know? This is quite an important moment and step.

I hope there can be some resolutiom here, opportunity to move forward and not let something else drag out. Ths coupled with ADR, and we are in quite an important phase of proceedings.

Good luck to all the genuine folks here.

*caught red-handed naked-shorting [it should've read]...

MadP

Thanks for the response,

A lot of thought goes into your posts, you have a way of both building a story and processing and synthesising data/ numbers.

I hear what you are saying about a deal through ADR being possible if a major wanted the whole lot. That if only after Block 12, then means that FRR won’t want a deal. Then there is the question of how log they want to drag it?

I know what you saying about YA. I myself have asked how come YA got off so lightly when they were red-handed caught-shorting.

But much of this remains to be seen, though we have little choice but to speculate (and, in the circumstances, rightly so…)…

My thinking about November and ADR is that come what may, we will learn something and that is, potentially, better than where we are right now.

LOL Bezzy

I guess am thinking about Georgia, Block 12 and arbitration hearing in Sweden...

Does anyone have any info or links regarding arbitration?

Thanks in advance!!

Agreed, trick is to see through the noise (not that I need to tell you - you seasoned enough).