RE: Panther V Fulcrum21 Feb 2026 13:48
JP – I’d say 2–3 months at the most and closing. Both will hopefully multibag this year, but Panther is the superior strategic play by a country mile. With Traxys on board and infrastructure already in place @ Winston, Panther is primed to leapfrog Fulcrum to production.
With a measiky sub £7.5M market cap, Panther is roughly half the price of Fulcrum. Yet, Panther’s Winston Project already boasts multimillion-dollar infrastructure (power and roads) that Fulcrum still has to fund and build.
The Traxys "Black Swan" also gives Panther the edge : This isn't just an offtake deal; it’s a pathway to non-dilutive financing. Traxys makes Panther "bankable," allowing them to reach cash flow without the heavy share dilution typical of juniors.
Winston nearly a Plug-and-Play relative to a normal plant build which will require minimum Capex. Also by utilizing an active Mine Closure Plan and on-site power, Panther has slashed the technical and regulatory hurdles. They also benefit directly from the recovery testing (not least the Gallium) that Extrakt has already pioneered for Fulcrum.
While Fulcrum is a tailing specialist, Panther offers the same tailings exposure but also nearly "free" exposure to district-scale exploration, including the 2,000m drill program at Obonga (which will kick off in approx 4 weeks once the drill crews are finished @ Winston) and magnesium recovery at Dotted Lake - no indication given for when this will happen or how long the process will take - but if it recoverable - then there is potentially big big numbers (think $billions) of mg @ dotted lake.
As above, both companies will be winners this year, both companies share info and will benefit from the sector tailwinds, but for me, the smart money—and the majority of my "hard-earned" - is on Panther.
#thenextggpx3