Member Info for cbaron

16.07

Completely agree. A successful fund raise done and dusted in short shrift and moving on to the next stage safely, with money in the bank and no justification for the old funding monkey on the back to reappear in the short term.

A nose or two out of joint that they didn't get a gold embossed envelope from the BoD enclosing a grovelling invitation for them to participate, but you can't win them all.

13.25

"what you are trying to do is cancel my voice"

Chance would be a fine thing!

This is sounding more like a woke movement.

Let's get real. This is capitalism at its most extreme and here we are talking about ESG?

Really?

You gotta larf!

So,

in a nutshell you are doing what you accused me of and sitting back and doing nothing........make your mind up!

12.25

Oooh! Touched a nerve?

By all means carry on your crusade and activism, though kindly do it quietly.

I prefer realism.

How about trying it?

We neither want nor need your view on all matters.

PANR is an AIM stock, for now.

If you don't like the way the AIM market works, don't invest in it.

If you don't like the way the company or its brokers behave, sell up,

and go and do something else less stressful.

Exploration companies need funds to explore and do what they do as and when they need it. It's an investment in their future and their ability to ultimately deliver. Fail to invest and fail to survive.

...announce the intention to raise funds.

Had they announced ahead of time then there's a likelihood that the SP would have bombed much further than it did and they'd be raising at a much lower SP. Damned if they do what they did, and keep it quiet, and they're blamed for being conspiratorial.

Ultimately, I'm happy with the end result.

Rabito,

Thank you for the clarification.

I concede the point Bricks.

10.39 should have read 10.18

10.39

Once again you seek to mislead.

Tony Beilman has been consistent throughout. He's the man at the 'sharp end' so to speak.

09.58

"We have a completely different Management in place….."

No we don't! We have a few new faces but the core production team remains as does the myriad of consultants and advisors whose science and methodology was lauded until it was found wanting. It takes very small margins to turn success into something less.

The business continues to have great potential. On that we agree but it is not a done deal and, like it or not, in this industry nothing is ever done until its done.

I'm no less positive in what I believe will be a successful outcome, but much more circumspect. As to the gas deal? Hmm? Trump? Keep your eye on the oil and the gas might, just might, add the icing on the cake.

Bricks,

So we ignore all historical events and recollections of them, howsoever factual? The facts are that there have been past production issues. There is no way of hiding that and nor should we. It is far more real and apt than mindless ramping.

A balanced view is needed.

I for one am fed up of seeing the infantile booms and rockets as soon as something mildly positive happens.

Investment here represents a part of many peoples financial plans and their future, all funded by hard earned cash - it is not a kindergarden.

06.16

Have you tried the English language? Are you Gerald from Clarkson's Farm?

1. How can all of those hitherto widely hailed experts get it so wrong with Megrez. So much for reputations and so much for the technologies. Emperor's new clothes? Perhaps a bit harsh, but it does beg the question.

2. Let's not be blinded by Megrez - the company still sits on very valuable marketable resources.

3. Don't invest more than you can afford to lose, particularly in oily Aims.

09.36

Deepcut,

Thank you.

7.21 & 7.22

Deepcut, thank you.

Is it reasonable to assume, given that each of these zones is stratigraphically separated, that the water salinity will be similar or the same?

This would be an extraordinary step forward. Expect a massive kick-back from the environmentalists but on the face of it great news.

No U-turns required!

15.04

I think you need to check your research.

"Aphun and Kodiak are established, proven and 100% company-owned; required infrastructure (road and pipeline) are completed......"

I also meant to query that if the answer is that each is discreet, then it would be wrong to suppose that other tests will correlate with the first one?

All will be entirely different other than by coincidence, given different ages formations DMAX etc?

11.07

"does this have any bearing on the other zones given they are a different formation?"

A very good question which I'd love one of our resident experts to answer please. Is it fair to assume that each target interval is discreet with a top and bottom seal and no pressure transference?

Thanks.