Member Info for Cautious11

Re shareholding’s. On the Bloe website 3rd feb 2020. shows Paul Haywood holds 2143429
But Lse front page shows he holds 2749454 + 977383 on the 5th of June 19, so a total of 3726837
Why the discrepancy. Dimmick piddling few the same

Another strong day. My only concern is the chance of a placing while the share price is buoyant.It is Aim and that’s what it’s all about

Ajw I would be a lot happier if the company ie PH put some photos out and an update on how far Bago have got so far. Wouldn’t cost anything for some communication

Hepseal I appreciate the qualification he has but not sure how much practical experience he has had
Bungle the revised Rns was just to clarify and make clearer the boepd

Bungle he might have been a nice guy but he is the one who told Hepseal and myself that gas purchases would take 8 weeks from signed contract.

Touched a nerve Bill. True colours coming out now. So basically your saying once you have got your money your gone. Well on the basis your selling target is around 9p which you obviously believe will happen but tell new punters this share isn’t worth it, make your mind knob

Still not answered the question. Too hard.

Bill I don’t think you have explained why you have changed your name, was it because you have been caught out. I know awhile back I used to read your posts and then realised you were chucking some lies in, after that you became insignificant,. You obviously have an agenda and probably being paid to naked short sell for a company. It’s not illegal but should be. Anyway the way you are ****ging people off on here who are currently loosing hard earned money just shows the kind of person you are. Vicious and vindictive. Once that company you work for has hit its target I’m sure you’ll disappear again.

Ajw I appreciate what you say but it still doesn’t give them the right to tell Hepseal and me 8 weeks from contract for gas supply. They knew this was wrong. I queried this with Justin last week when I rang him and his response wasn’t to impressive.

Ajw I appreciate you given us ii’s on here the benifit of your knowledge But the problem I have got is nothing is guaranteed. 16 may not work out, 38 water cut could alter and 51 could be our saviour but we said this about 38.
3 months back Hepseal contacted the office to be told the gas connection would take 8 weeks after contract is signed, I didn’t believe this and also spoke to Justin to be told the same thing
So now we could be waiting up to 7 months, surely any competent person in Bloe should have known this at the time rather than spout the cr@p that they did. And to mention in the recent Rns about Black Sea exploration tender is just another smoke screen
Ajw surely you have to acknowledge this, this isn’t a deramp has I’m well under water here, ,it’s just were I think we are. PH should be booted out, to me he can’t be trusted and any credibility he had as gone.

Nice one samplemix. What I’m not sure about is how both 16 and 38 both have 70% plus water cut when 16’s figure included a failed section

The way things are it’s steady steps hopefully forward. At least we know about the water cut, it took them months to admit it re 16, let’s get the gas connected and 51 sorted. I think 16 will be a bonus if things improve
dmj1 post at 7.34 Great Rns. 600 bopd plus gas £15 million per year Fantastic ( don’t you read the Rns before you spout your rubbish ) and someone 3 days ago was telling you the gas connection will be another 3 months and you rubbished him. Bit of an expert really!!!

djm1 if know one’s going to purchase it you had better tell bloe to leave the oil in the ground if it’s all about the gas. I think commercially they are both as important. It’s about the money (basic)
Anyway it looks like the market are not too impressed with the gas figures anyway at present

For the ones on here who struggle understanding. I rang just to confirm that the figures of boepd actually meant combined gas and oil, mainly because it keeps being said on here that the gas has much more potential in the ground than the oil and the figures provided so far shows the oil is more dominant. Speaking to Jason he was unsure but when he checked with the two operational men in the office they actually said the gas figure which was stated in boepd is all gas and you have to add the oil to that, I said are you sure because it normally means combined all resources but they were adamant. Obviously they were wrong because the updated Rns now confirms opposite to what they said
Is that alright for you dmj1 or have you anymore condescending matters

Ajw Bungle Pecton, I have spent 20mins on the phone with Justin and to be fair he didn’t know either but fortunately he had 2 operation guys in the office and they have confirmed twice to me that the gas figures are for gas only which is excellent. I stated they should not have used boepd and Justin agreed. He is going to have a word with PH to hopefully mention this in any interview he may do. Like me I think these figures have been misread and make a big difference
Hopefully we will get some confirmation officially at some point

Ajw I wish I could contact you direct with information I have

Cheers Ajw. . I think it does matter a lot because obviously it makes a big difference to total profit. The fact neither of us knows tells me the Rns is once again not making it clear and obvious
I’m going to take it PH is trying it on again. And if he gets interviewed they only ask prearranged questions and don’t push. I would love to interview him cos I would give him hell

Ajw I appreciate what you are saying but if you look at the production test chart and take for instance the 31hr flow time it reads 231bopd average oil and a gas rate of 508 boepd. Is this 508 boepd all gas or combined because it reads as if it is all gas, It’s ambiguous to me because if it is all gas then there is more gas than oil, but on my previous post the re the highlights I think it shows more oil than gas

Ajw. The first paragraph under highlights in the Rns states peak production rates have exceeded 300 bopd and gas to an equivalent of 550 boepd total. I take it the gas figure also includes the oil because he has put total So more oil than gas, I hope I’m wrong
because as you know I just don’t trust PH

They say they are hoping to reduce the water flow at 16 but no mention of reducing it at 38 even though very similar in percentage terms. Is it a different problem or have we just got to except it.
Hepseal your quiet re gas production in January