Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
Looks like Mr Carp is keeping the faith, bloody good effort getting those shares this morning as there's bugger all around for us lesser mortals
If the client wants changes surely you wouldn't say "Get Lost, its as is or nothing!"
Anyone remember this losers post on the news of the MOU: Hold on, just going to agree to an MOU with Apple to buy them out for a trillion dollars.....you know, if I ever manage to get a trillion dollars...and even if I do, I still don't have to do it. Like I said, not worth the paper it's written on. It's all HYPOTHETICAL.
JV with Martin Heath signed off. CEO expects material uplift in shareholder value
Something good must be coming as another creditor has agreed to take shares and at a premium rather than cash. They had around �740,000 in cash at full year stage so could have paid off creditors.
Are you saying that the company has lied in its RNS's? Are you suggesting that they and their nomad have been peddling lies in order to profit from any share price rise resulting from the lies? Carry on Dave, shares are recovering. More people making money from buying the dip.
Don't think its dodgy, what i was doing is called sarcasm. BTW exploration companies have no revenues, employees or premises as you define them, are you stating that they are scam companies?
They all must be dodgy then. In fact my own company which has a registered office different to where i actually work must be dodgy along with many thousands of other companies! My God Dave MUST be right!
You don't believe that investors have made money here buying the dips, are you jealous?
So you DO NOT know the ins and outs of either company, just what everyone else who can read a RNS knows?
How do you know there are no employees? Revenue announced 22 Feb was �24,640 are you saying the company has lied about revenue? They have offices in London.
How do you know more about the ins and outs of this company? are you an employee or former employee of either?
You said an MOU is NOT an agreement. You're wrong and i'm just showing you that your wrong with fact. You on the other hand go off the tangent and post that i've said things which i then prove you did WRONGly.
Didn't say they were or weren't doing it, said it is an agreement which it is.
Never said or suggested it was binding, just thought i'd correct your bad and incorrect version of English with fact. Fact is that an MOU is an agreement, what else is it?????
Official definition of MOU: A memorandum of understanding (MOU or MoU) is a formal AGREEMENT between two or more parties. Wrong again.
20/9/17 RNS Change of Directors and this is my earlier post you're referring to: .....now they are looking at Seed as another tech provider. Get your facts right before posting rubbish
Good idea, new direction nothing to do with good causes except to the company and shareholders. New people in charge so makes sense new start and new name.
Good idea, new direction nothing to do with good causes except to the company and shareholders. New people in charge so makes sense new start and new name.
Looks like MSG are getting the upper hand with Black Cactus as share consideration off the table makes sense now they are looking at Seed as another tech provider. Couldn't have your providers owning your company.