Member Info for cannyladdy

I consider losing all my investment in this company a bad RNS. What part of ...exoects teh LSE will cancel teh admission of the company's shares to trading on AIM... do you not understand? Maybe you should stay away from the markets.

Worth putting Chris Ackers & Russell Backhouse on your failures watchlist and steer clear of any company they're involved in.Another AIM failure, surely they could have secured a deal in the last 3 years!!!!

Align commences with: NPV at a 12% discount rate suggests upside of 316%
We believe our NPV valuation is conservative and initiate coverage of Bluebird with a target price of 11.85p and a Conviction Buy stance.

Didn't mention Blockchain!

Let me ask you a question Daveavt, do you think that Catenea will not in any way get any business, especially as they have a platform which can monetise artists work and the EU have made it more difficult for artists to monetise downloads? If so can you state why and please don't regurgitate previous bile but come up with intelligent answers.

Read the post properly and maybe learn to read English. Read it slowly and i suggest keep reading it until it makes sense.

Maybe today's rejection will push artists into approaching companies like Catenae in order to make sure they can get paid for downloads.

Once again the Troll has taken words out of context and totally misread my post. For you benefit i'll explain slowly. Maybe...today's.....rejection...will...push...ARTISTS...into...APPROACHING....companies...LIKE...Catenae...in...order...TO...MAKE...SURE...THEY...can...get...paid...for...downloads.

If your gona try and dismiss a post at the very least try and put it into context. Better yet get lost and leave this board to shareholders or those with something interesting to say.

The news out today is ok, so i believe that the 12% share price movement may be down to the EU copyright overhaul proposal, which has been voted against today. Now this has happened and will likely take years to resurrect, artists will be looking at other ways to make sure they are paid for their work being downloaded on the internet.

Not technically minded myself but isn't this what CTEA have been developing and are now offering with their Trust in Media JV? Maybe today's rejection will push artists into approaching companies like Catenae in order to make sure they can get paid for downloads.

Just seen this on a n other board from a poster (not me) and thought i'd share

The named investor has asked me to provide clarification for general info on his behalf. Please do not ask me follow up questions, this is not a back & forth

1. Why have you built a large stake?
I like the concept and the business is worth nothing right now. A property company for c£2m when you can barely buy a decent flat in London for that price. The market hasn't paid attention to this yet and so it can be a £20m valuation with very little effort once they get newsflow going that proves the model. I began testing the water to see what sort of position I could build without the price soaring....my early buys pushed the price up to c.0.57, i watched as it fell back to 0.4 and then started buying again...I'd like to get to 50m shares but equally I may sell out entirely ...all depends on how things progress

2. Why this share?
I am intrigued. Remember this is not an AIM share, it is a main market listing. So here's the thing: why spend £500k on listing fees for a company currently valued at c£2m when you could list on AIM for a fraction and with a much lighter regulatory regime? Furthermore, the directors and insiders hold over 50% of the equity and they've capped salaries. The main market listing seems an essential element if they are to get institutions to work with them - they don't like AIM companies - and I like dirctors to have serious skin in the game - if it's not good enough for them, it probably isn't good enough for a private investor. And right now, because it is so under the radar and has yet to deliver on the promise, there is huge value potential here...in my jusdgement

3. Isn't 14% excessive?
Maybe. I have some price targets along the way- but I am open to further increases too

Looks like Gary has been "building" on his position again (sorry for the pun) and now owns over 14%.

On another BB someone has put up that Liverpool City Council has only recently registered the planning application for the second acquisition. It states that the application is to convert 2 existing villas into 16 self contained apartments. In April DKE also announced that the housing association they were in talks with had recently requested additional rooms so hence the timescale in my mind.

Am i right in thinking that each time it slips below 0.5p he buys another slug? Obviously sees a lot of upside in this one.

going by the news on the first one in September they said they had the option of inviting offers for the property of �5m plus and added that the lease income would be attractive to institutions. I take it that they sell the income for the period of the lease and the institutions benefit from regular income which rises annualy as is CPI linked making it a more sure long term investment than stocks or bonds.

Over �400k worth of CPI linked earnings per year announced so far, market cap �less than �2m

Unlike You Dave I am a shareholder. I'll give you the promoter bit, but your blog hogging follow up posts are ridiculous. Ever heard of commercial confidentiality? Why the hell would CTEA give out the name of the promoter to its competitors? Also most RNS' don't reveal the name of the client. And as you highlighted they have a deal signed with the promoter so I can only imagine that the promoter is dealing with its artiste clients. As to unnamed events, google how many concerts, festivals etc are being held in the UK this summer, each would have to be explained in an RNS making it the size of a Novel, also as i mentioned earlier the client, the promoter will no doubt pick the best of the events to use this product. So come on, where's the bad news? Shares up 16% as i write!

Dave, who do you think the client is? its quite clear to me: Trust in Media will provide event marketing and social media analytical services for a number of artists playing at events ...... Are there too many words in the RNS, or is it a lack of pictures which is confusing you? They also won't be giving the analytics away for free

You really are priceless Dave, how on earth can you say that the artists are irrelevant? Its the artists that will generate revenue as very clearly stated in the RNS. All you are doing is showing yourself up as a Troll with nothing of substance to say. Go away!

Good to see CTEA up and on good news. For the benefit of Dave and Mitch and with just a tiny bit of research, Ascot's Dubai duty free Shergar Cup and Concert is featuring Rita Ora, Example & DJ Wire, Soul II Soul and DJ Scott Mills. Not small names. There not going to mention companies as the RNS clearly states ARTISTS. There are a number of artists appearing at these venues so do you expect an RNS to list them all that they have approached? Do you really think that an artists is going to give up the chance at getting these analytics? Great start to the CTEA story.

Maybe he likes property but doesn't want the dilution a REIT creates to keep growing, DKE expect little or no dilution going forward whcih makes a bloody change for a small cap stock.

He's at it again