Member Info for calderkate

Odx were never contracted to provide a test to gov, the contract was for manufacturing the tests for gov. Are you saying gov had access to a test that ODX could have manufactured for gov?

Were they part of the 'UK Rapid Antigen Test Consortium yes or no?

Imo will not have to repay pre production payment back, let's wait and see don't forget Omega Diagnostics at the time were part of the 'UK Rapid Antigen Test Consortium' were novacyt part of that?

Taking their time if gov have such a good case.

There you go again, in your opinion.

Against

Legally qualified legal representative who gave legal advice.

Novacyt case nothing to do with ODX/CNSL case.

2 different contracts, also 2 different lots of legal advice from different legal companies/lawyers.

Company has taken legal advice which says different to your assumptions/suppositions.

Plus don't forget the Royalty payment of upto £1m.

You would say that wouldn't you Dsaf, just like you did about the full year results.

What's that news of another Italian Job😎😎😎

Well I did think that company were heading to better than already announced results. Nothing to say they wouldn't be good results, just persistent daily posts by a group of naysayers who continue to stay around like a bad stench.

And yet another daily contribution from the big CEO from another company. Horrible individual totally repugnant, thinks he knows more better than company.

You forgot to include the fact Captain Swag has posted 9 times today, and Faye(Dsaf) has posted 5 times, and both of them are non-shareholders so your point Mr Big CEO is what exactly?

No need to don't you listen.

Don't have to, they announced that they were to be implemented in RNS,. No need to then say they had done what they had said they were going to do. Just need to say if they haven't.

Good results later this month who knows, no RNS to say they haven't been able to implement improvements as previously in RNS.

Oh no have the pair of you bought in. Diddums you need to get the right price.

I never deal with 666.

Not revealing to you what I'm busy in, but a good difference already. Bye Bye.

Says Dsaf

i disagree with all your responses, and as i have said before you say that i lie and all i do is repeat figures from rns. look back at what company said, they always said they would sell visitect cd4 test. they never said in rns cash would be less than £4m,you niw claim that comoany paid for broker forecast. but you dismiss broker forecast of 10p paid for by company. something seems a little blinkered. choosing to take notice of certain things but not all things.

don't forget your biggest gaff, overdraft being withdrawn. it wasn't being used.

finally comoany are still confident that they will not have to repay pre production payment, as per rns. you meanwhile take no notice of what comoany has to say about that. hmm seems to be a pattern here by you. maybe you should just stick to posting on boards which you hold shares in. although you do seem to pick the ones where there are di****es.