Member Info for buffettology

I'll go for a conservative 26p

Chart is pointing to potentially 16p in September, so let's hope its double that (as a minimum) by December

Let's be honest the current market value is just silly. It doesn't reflect any aviation or real auto. You could argue its just 10x fleet sales. This will soon change

A substantial amount of large contracts will be announced in the next 6 months and this should be much higher by then but it takes a while for the market to wake up and trust companies. There should not be any denying the true value once more sizeable contracts are announced. Who knows, they could already won a load and its a matter of when to announce them!? Fingers crossed the same valuation that was used on Mobileye is applied!

16p by September hey!

Cool . So therefore if we assume to get 50% of the 900 then 10 x that would be fair value but that ignores fleet and aviation?

How many shares in issue is a valid point. Does anyone have the sums of the amount of shares in issue when mobileye was purchased to try to draw a vague comparison?

MrBB I think you are spot on with your assumption. Get a few more contracts over the line and that 15-20p valuation starts to move upwards. I just want them to put real vues on the deals when they announce them to make all wake up realise

MrBB I think you are spot on with your assumption. Get a few more contracts over the line and that 15-20p valuation starts to move upwards. I just want them to put real vues on the deals when they announce them to make all wake up realise

This is the big worry - how much would the board accept if an offer came in? God only knows! I just hope that we wouldn't be going for anything under 1 billion but who knows we may not even go for what the brokers feel we should be currently trading at.

Which would therefore imply complete market domination and over and above what was previously suggested to be our % of the market

They would not write that if they were not certain on achievement

There's no harm in putting out a conservative estimate of revenues from secured contracts. They have done in the past. Its how this is worded too. They really need to emphasising the 'additional' point. There's also now harm in them projecting that with increased revenues and re-evalatuon of figures that breakeven could be brought forward. Again, how this is worded. They have all the figures and projections. It surely can't be rocket science.

Thoughts on whether See will present a picture in monetary terms of the pipeline of recently won contracts (across all divisions) or is this going to be far to risky? I think they need to so something along these lines. The issue at the moment is the market can't fathom out the extent of these contracts especially the aviation ones which aren't even factored into the broker forecasts!

Not sure if you viewed the independent financial analysis on YouTube but looks like we are pretty sound for a few years (no need for begging bowls) and by then according to the forecasts (independent) we should be generating sufficient cash to be at breakeven. The only bowls that I envisage going around would be in a few years when we are pulling in sufficient revenues and are share price is at a higher level to propel us to list on Nasdaq. At that point I think it'll be Institutional investors begging for sufficient stock!! Have a lovely day!!

Perhaps words out that its a good set of results and we see another rise into Tuesday!?

And share price down. Its a funny old world

Market will.only.like us when the serious revenues start rolling in/we start massively over achieving on broker forecasts/targets. Simples

Console based reference means?

I see this company is floating soon. Anyone got thoughts on its prospects and if it is likely to take market share away from Fever?