Member Info for BricksSA

I have lodged another official complaint with FCA. This is the 3rd time I have done it and have yet to see any action taken by them. All for the same thing !!! Price manipulation !!!

I urge you to report them to FCA. The email address is market.abuse@fca.org if you suspect they are doing anything on purpose to hold this share price down.

wonder if BH are miffed and involved somehow with them ? .....

No problems GT....here's an interesting read for you. https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/w-010-6661?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true&bhcp=1

So what makes you think we wont get a mining license then if you have done your research ?

@Spitfire you are correct....pity you dont do research. We are now 15 months into the process of obtaining the mining license and this normally takes 18 months. For your edification https://www.proyectotoral.com/proyecto/
The license is a formality as it is previously a mining area and the locals are "over the moon" as it will be a boost to the regions economy.

Hold or buy guys.....I notice the 1st transaction today is a reversal of a so called "sell" yesterday....

There is a lot of work on at the moment :-$

I sent LR this email this morning.
Hi Laurence,
Any update on progress on any front (and there are many at the moment for EUZ I guess) via RNS will be appreciated by investors.
I know there is a lot happening at the moment and you must be rather busy but it would be great if you can share an update soon.
The Turner Pope broker note yesterday was not taken well by investors as they seemed to think the last Mets report added absolutely 0 value to their previous valuation. This somehow needs to be rectified as it cannot possibly be the same with further derisking having taken place.
His response...."understand and want to put out something meaningful, just going through all work at present"
I trust I have not offended a jaded dj suffering from Tooth ache that causes eyesight problems where he cant see the ship from the fleet any discomfort as I am really a gentleman and a very well mannered guy. GLA DYOR.

3 dj's deramping....

9 shareholders banking ......

@ Sheds....I agree...0.050 by close of play I would take :-$
@Lloyd....There is a lot going on at the moment....TD24 complete...results in for assay no doubt...TD25 underway....Hydro geological tests underway as well....more testing taking place to improve zinc recovery with WA....deleterious testing underway....mining license underway....Data room open.....who knows when the next RNS will be and it could be on any of these items...I am hoping the more we de risk...the more expensive the asset becomes to a buyer....I think the buyer is already lined up and he also knows that it will be more expensive... So to hazard a guess is difficult.... LR must be a very busy man at the moment..:-$

Thats the problem Numpty....Preliminary results....the market was expecting Final results....It was labelled Preliminary based on WA recommendations.... :-$

Fook...so my 0.0138 was way off the mark....who had 0.071 ?
I guess a half baked Met report (without deleterious test results) deserves a half baked Broker report......
Its frigging tough going being an EUZ shareholder...... long and strong !!

@Shed...click on the link shared earlier by share_talk

@ Gizzard....conservative ??...I think its actually a copout on their part....so they did not see in value being added with the preliminary met results....thats what they are telling us. I think LR fired the wrong broker LOL

Is it yours Kiwi ?

MFM...have you been hacked ? This post very unlike you......

Did anyone pick this up from the original NI 43 -101 report ?....page 9. Now I do know that during recent times the block model was changed to focus on high core resources... Does anyone else think that our resource model ito Silver could have got a bit bigger perhaps based on the below... I am thinking along these lines....
"The frequency distributions of lead, zinc, copper and silver sample populations were examined to identify the
presence of extreme high-grade outlier populations. Outlier values may result from sampling errors and can
exert an undue influence during block grade interpolation. They can result in over-estimation of block grades
and lead to poor reconciliation of expected and actual metal production. The methodology employed for
establishing the outlier limit was to examine the distribution of the sample population.
The selection of outlier values was based on the deviation of the grade distribution from a straight line in the
probability plot. There were no outliers identified by Micon for lead, zinc and copper. Based on the plot and the
above analyses, Micon identified silver samples above 200 g/t Ag, as outliers. There are four silver assays
greater than the specified outlier values. Those grades were reduced to the respective top-cutting value in the
assay database."

There are warrants still outstanding at 0.0250
http://www.europametals.com/site/investor-information/capital-structure