We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
Let’s buy Trevor a calculator for Xmas…..
Mark …or you could save time…..go to your nearest window ….take bundle of cash and chuck it out into the wide wide World and with this strategy also save yourself a bundle of time filling g in OO paperwork….You’re welcome
Oh my goodness……well as they say you can take a horse to water….but you can’t make it drink
No I think this can’t be right, many on here were saying that the next RNS would be the 1st IM announcement and not this. I think it’s probably it just an administrative error and they had 2 RNSs prepared and published the wrong one regarding **** loads more confetti shares rather than the 1st IM. I am 100% confident the error will be rectified very soon
Oh for god sake …..NONE OF THE BIG 4 HAVE EVER MADE ANY COMMENT FORMAL OR INFORMAL SUGGESTING THEY AGREE WITH THE REGULATORY ACCOUNTING VALIDITY OF IM SYME FLAVOUR! PERIOD
I am a patient man but when is enough……
I’ll eat your shorts if they deliver it in July
16 trading days until f*** all happens again …more excuses are made and the paid ramper Syme employees move onto the issues new script. Couldn’t make this stuff up. It’s like Benny Hill at his finest …Syme ….comedy gold. I honestly don’t know what I’ll do to cheer me up on a bad day when it goes bust
Let’s be honest Tradeflow may have some better political animals at the helm who can present better but in profitability terms there not that much better than the IM bonkers idea lot. They just are better con men than AZ is atm. Dilution inevitable, profit even in the longer time is like pinning your hopes on my ****apoo to win a greyhound race and the company is basically just eeeking out survival to line a small group of peoples pockets. Disgraceful really! But how you paid boiler room crew sleep at nights when you are proven to not be invested completely defeats me and thank bid a few of us continue to be here to protect the uninformed passers by
Rosie finally proof that Burnely is not an investor at all.
1. Searching for that post would have taken a lot of time and effort or was more likely held on a database/filing system of some kind.
2. The copy and paste of that particular post has been done to me several times by several different rampers....but employees would be a much better name
3. The only people that would have occurred in this manner would be through the use of a share/system/database of some kind that these vile rampers/SYME employees are using
4. QED Barnsley is an invested multiple user employee of SYME and is part of systematic trolling on here.
What a chump - unable to get a proper job, unable to afford to even buy SYME shares and earns pennies posting on here for a company that preys on native investors. Burnley you are a waste of space
ITS ALWAYS THE SAME:
NO IDENTITIES
NO FINANCIALS
NDA’S
ITS FING LAUGHABLE - ARE YOU GUYS REALLY I MEAN REALLY THIS STUPID
Help me with the shorters economics and risk calculations. I would have thought that as we’ve seen such dramatic SP reduction (80%+ in a year) the shorters would have made significant upside during that decline - but now the SP has potentially got to near its bottom (I realise it could go further but unlikely to the same degree as the last 12 months) isn’t there potential upside/ risk calculation less favourable. Would t they want to exit and look for other fish to fry? Instead the short % is increasing? Also what does the 8% total short actual mean ….8% of the shares in issuance are in the hands of shorters?
And the end of that post is what drives many of us to continue posting the FACTS on this flawed and dangerous investment. The “fantastic entry point” is just grossly misleading. Shame on you
I didn’t know PowerPoint presentations were a “proprietary platform”. Platforms my rear end - they have zip!
Biggest flawed stream of consciousness on this and indeed any BB is that the non invested should have no voice and no interest. The very statement by so many on here goes some way to explain why the LTHs are in the dire predicament they are in. Without balancing and sometimes strongly held opposing views what would be the point in any discussion forum?
Schillachi ….let me finish your post for you..
Extrader…why so bothered to actually do significant detailed research and present the results of your research on a board designed to help investors, potential investors understand and discuss facts about the company. Is it because you have relevant expertise in financial analysis to bring important information to everyone’s attention ?
So basically….ignore facts, ignore past performance, ignore past promises undelivered ….excellent professional investment t advice
Thats weird ...you’re right it is showing -12.63 on some screens and still up at close 0.81% on other screens. Either way I have to say its a miracle this isn’t much lower. I have a couple of theories:
1. The share holder base is predominantly what I affectionately call “the faithful” who could be told that syme had made loss equivalent to the GDP of a small country and they would still say this was all “in AZ’s plan”. Its a bit like the monty python sketch where the bloke gets all his arms and legs cut off and he says its just a flesh wound.
2. Is that there are just so many dark dealings in share ownership terms in this “church/company” that any one of a host of people/organisations could be propping it up on days like today to ensure the “continuity” (lets call it that of the status quo” which for some people is rather pleasant
Just my own thoughts but in case I do get struck down by a bolt of lightning sent my way by AZ “Hail AZ, Hail Syme Global”...always best to hedge your bets where deities are concerned dont you think?
It’s not a company …it’s a religion.
Oh Garda please stop my sides are splitting. Let’s be really clear the results if and when they do materialise I 100% going to be disastrous and result in a death plunge of the SP