Member Info for bonker99

Good lord - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mining_industry_of_Botswana

Yes, MOD will fully walk the production walk, JH knows what he's doing, they're not just exploration CVs there.

I'm "old" with dodgy eyes mate, I probably wouldn't go for the headset thing but I'd pay to stream the right footage live to my big 4K TV and decent hi-fi for sure.

It's no different to people paying stupid money to watch PL football games - it's the exact same thing in fact.

Worth it at 7p but not worth it at 8p?

I think you're right about the way some posts are sounding ;)

Just imagine being a Dad having to haul your daughter(s) and her mates to a gig somewhere through mad traffic then sit around for hours or come back later again to pick em up. All at £50+ a ticket to be 50 yards from the stage plus time and petrol lol

Or you just press a couple of buttons on your mobile on-demand and they're all "at the gig" without you having to move your butt and at a fraction of the cost.

Bit of a no-brainer imo.

Just look at these numbers - all of these can be added to/multiplied by selling "seats" to people who could/would never make it otherwise:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest-grossing_concert_tours#2010s

I'm into music quite a bit but can only make a handful of gigs per year because they're so time consuming but offer me a decent virtual "seat" at Led Zeppelin's very final gig on the Moon and I'm reaching for me wallet for sure.

XEL?

Now you're talking :)

I'll take another 400x tvm.

Well we'll see what they do in the end - it wasn't so long ago they were claiming innocence re the secondary market whilst shipping BOXES of prime arena gig tickets to Seatwave (founded by an "ex" TM Director - shock).

Same opp still applies to EVRH though - limited primary supply, sell the same "seat" ad infinitum.

19p mate ;)

Just to double-underline the opp here.

The secondary ticket market is worth £100s millions of pounds a year but they're all working on one physical ticket sale per available seat.

The difference here (and trust me, promoter's tongues are hanging out at this prospect) is that the same "seat" can be sold an infinite number of times and it's no more complicated than selling an original paper ticket. In fact, your overheads are slashed because you hardly need any people between you and the paying punter.

It's an amazing model for revolutionising an industry that has changed little in a century. Lower costs per sale, VASTLY increased sales volumes and all on top of the already-gouging-you physical ticket/seat revenue :)

Fast forward the tape of course and you'll end up with the same model of auctioning off of virtual tickets to the highest bid and round we all go again but with nothing but electronic delivery, no pesky posting of tickets etc. Yet more money :)

You've convinced me - because that sale isn't already done in the past but will occur in the future instead, I'm selling all my shares.

Soz peeps, I got the time thing all wrong.

I know the secondary market inside out mate, with the emphasis on the inside lol

Staggering amounts of money there and I think it oh-so timely that TM have done that now - they're owned by Live Nation (US money) of course.

Breaking:

Ticketmaster are closing the Seatwave and GetMeIn secondary ticket sites.

That could be very good news for this because once a lockout from a top gig becomes a complete and utter lockout with no chance of buying your way into it via a secondary site then things like this become the only choice for those desperate to experience a given gig however they can.

T3 wasn't sold at a price, it was sold at a percentage of something that will grow in value, possibly hugely, over time.

Nothing wrong with lithium plays but contrasted wth copper that's a market that could well become saturated with supply just as the copper supply chain starts to disintegrate.

Nice name lol - I'm a nuke-head so I'm guessing they're in for the Fat Man rather than the Little Boy :)

BTW, not to put too fine a point on it but the 8.2p level is all about the (projected) 10x to 82p imo.

Just saying.

I would assume the placing shares were lent out to a big short hence the comedy "selling" but now they've gotta buy them back :)

The thing about buying a bottom pivot is that if you want thick volume around there as a buyer then you've gotta start weighing in just above it because once they print the tech number they "need" they often turn so quickly that you can't get a bean within 20% of that bottom :)

As I say, a hefty mcap on face value but I've got experience in this industry and I know for sure how much money these guys could be raking in over the coming years. If that mcap ends up way north of a £billion in the years ahead I wouldn't be at all surprised and as they're shooting in 8k(!) then you know this infrastructure creation period isn't about short-term gains, it's about a completely new revenue channel creation on a multi-decade timeline.

A pension-maker if it all comes together.

I can't give you any guarantees about anything I'm afraid but she's printed 8.03p and that's bloody close to what I would have thought would very likely have been dead-bottom at mid 7s but they can always just throw a fake trade/print down if they need to at mid 7s if the market goes against them in volume and there's some bloody chunky buys going in :)

Hefty mcap here still at c£100m but lordy, the potential is amazing and she could do anything to the upside over the next six months.

They may well Bull Pennant this back to mid teens

If it's not bottomed already then it's bloody close to it :)

Markets "hating" particular sectors almost always means they're pushing them sideways to collect shares from bored PIs while driving PIs into their "loved"/momentum sectors so they can offload on them.

You can make money by chasing momentum for sure but you can make a lot more money by seeing the play ahead of time and loading up before your own shares/sector magically becomes the new momentum play and you've got a lower average than virtually enyone else - it's that low average that enables you to multiply your money more than everyone else.

The only way you lose on these plays is by not being able to wait months/quarters for the payday and selling out low to chase some other shiny rainbow - usually just as the smart money is offing their holdings there.

Maybe in the Shires mate lol

Barclays funded Cupric Canyon in 2015/2016 IIRC, not a lot's changed since then I shouldn't think other than them spending more money on pumping equities to make a buck as they struggle to make money from their usual usury game.