Member Info for BogdanT

Read again Seagulls, its an ea permit to recycle tons of volumes of mass, unusual for a demonstration line which aims at process first and needs to be optimally small before going forward. You dont need to refine volumes in tons for assessing the process because of the additional industrial setup it needs, its not fit for a demonstration line to have tons on the line. Cant find a news release saying that they apllied for one. And why would they need a consulting company for a new permit as long as they submitted and got the first one. Raising eyebrows from top to bottom in my view.

I believe its self explanatory da_mole. Ea delay and bank selling /shorting are unusual in my opinion and there are arguments to that which i dont really need post but are somehow commonsense.

Seems that altilium metals got an EA permit for by-the-ton recycling of li ion car batteries on a lab demonstration line?

https://altilium-metals.com/award-of-an-environmental-agency-permit-to-recycle-electric-vehicle-battery-black-mass-at-the-metric-tons-scale-at-our-uk-battery-recycling-technology-centre/

Cant find the date it apllied for it..

I thing this company may be sitting on a big snake's tail here, starts to make sense now the delays in permit and investing bank's silly behaviour as well which shorts a stock thats about to pop

Plant is designed to work continously, its been mentioned in podcasts more than once. And they should be able to add more plants in the same facility as well, about 4 although not sure about the number, its in one of the older podcasts.

In my opinion, it is 2 news away from hundreds of millons mcap: ea for lithium and recyclus fca confirmation

And a lth as well. You're chewing your nails in waiting for 14 years but can't wait 3 months and a bit after. Doesn't add up

Unless it's a fabricated example given to others in a similar situation to convince them to sell. Are you genuine etank?

I have no concerns regarding TM1.

Thank you for the good faith technical advice. Rarely you see an experienced professional willing to share pro bono such a lengthy assessment.

Yes... The ''free'' market has other plans for todays sp. Company looks v promising though

Big buys have a waiver/discount on this stock for being illiquid. If you try to buy more than £10k worth you'll get a price buy quote lower than for £1k.

All the big transactions during the laet days were buys

Every penny lost here will be recovered from the directors

https://tradingeconomics.com/united-kingdom/electricity-price

We could still unite and bring the board of directors to court to claim any shareholders losses because they rejected the Foschini bid without another resonable offer on the table

Because small shareholders are not legally represented nor informed. Only way to get some value out is by joining and get a solicitor. Without representation shareholders dont matter

Too late for this one in my opinion, its been done quick. Good example of financial engineering and dishonesty

Part from interpath's faq for shareholders

'' Will there be any future value in my shares?
You should seek advice from an independent financial adviser. Although the
Administrators will seek to maximise realisable value for the Company’s assets, it is
considered very unlikely that the shares will have any value in future.''

The bidding is ongoing but they already know there wont be any value left for shareholders... Couldnt be more clear in my opinion, even if any residual value is available its not intended to be paid this way.

And honestly, the hipocrisy of the message makes me sick

https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-11445437/Favourite-Kates-considers-Joules-bid.html

https://www.ft.com/content/e50c48a2-5b87-47fd-971e-fa9c3e20bb44

Joules Group (UK): Constituent Deletion
Changes in FTSE UK Index Series

14 November 2022

Following the appointment of administrators and suspension of trading in Joules Group (UK, constituent), please see details of affected indexes and effective dates below:

Index. FTSE AIM All-Share Index

Effective From. 17 November 2022

https://www.sharecast.com/news/Company-Announcement-General/Joules-Group--dl33107463.html

Regardless of interpretation, news is welcomed. Hope that this healthy openness in sharing company plans and activity to shareholders will become a communications standard , I for one appreciate it.

Thank you SAE for the news

If that 21% will be worth a few tens of millions in the following years, then this transaction could be called fair. No details have been given regarding the private equity injection in Proteus.

It's my opinion as well that Sae has some good quality management, Usk included.. But not that inspired with their information disclosure policies

"The DoE has identified major potential for the development of tidal and current energy production, which at present is largely underdeveloped. The funding is expected to be released in 2023, marking the “largest investment in tidal and river current energy technologies in the United States,” according to the DoE. The government has already released a notice of intent announcing the new funding opportunity.

The sector will require greater research and development prior to the development of large-scale projects, due to underinvestment in the renewable energy source to date... "

https://oilprice.com/Alternative-Energy/Tidal-Energy/US-Increases-Its-Bets-On-Tidal-Power.amp.html

And SAE just sold its long expensive tidal tech experience for less than 1 mil.. Well done

I believe we run the risk of exaggerating the issue. A complaint to an authority is not a drag into a trial, that's what these institutions are for. Big shareholders can ask for reports directly from the company.

It's pretty clear that the company is witholding important information while it has a moral and legal obligation to inform. Should be all the evidence needed, the authority will asses further.

"CHAPTER 3
DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
Article 17
Public disclosure of inside information
1. An issuer shall inform the public as soon as possible of inside information which directly concerns that issuer.
The issuer shall ensure that the inside information is made public in a manner which enables fast access and complete, correct and timely assessment of the information by the public..."

I would go with this one

"
Report a concern to the primary market integrity team
If you are concerned about disclosures by a listed company, please contact primary.market.integrity@fca.org.uk.
Find out more about how to make a complaint against an issuer."

https://www.fca.org.uk/markets/market-abuse/how-report-suspected-market-abuse-individual

https://www.fca.org.uk/markets/primary-markets/contact/complaint-against-issuer

Mention that you've talked to the company as well