Member Info for bluerill

And, for sanity's sake, if anyone is wondering where in the f this little gem came from: 'Tosca, with its debenture holding over SLE, will pick up most assets for pennies, but for us shareholders, our holdings will be valued at zero...', let me assure everyone it was straight from this very strange creature's dark imagination - motive unknown - but no less outrageously schizophrenic for that.

In fact, tomorrow should likely prove a useful day in court in one of those 'game over' jurisdictions which, if past is prelude, will then cause this nut-nut back out of yet another self-imposed chat board retirement for the nth time, in order to provide some fumbling take that no one asked for or requires, instead of just apologising for yet again being a useless tool and then disappearing for real for a change.

Ding, ding, ding! who had less than 3 business days because you're winner!

meantime, this rounding error shows his true colours (and level of understanding of the company in question) with his highest rated post, combining a spectacular level of ignorance with unfettered bile and personal animus, to date, a not inconsiderable achievement considering his unmatched record of publishing first-rate gibberish over such a long and ignominious 'career'.

Ooooh, I'm feeling inspired:

- Sorry, was THAT an apology???

- I predict that farewell non-apology will set the SLE.L board record for upticks.

- I then predict the shortest retirement in the history of chat boards, and when he returns - because everyone knows his ego will not allow him to honour his pledge -guaranteed he still won't have read the re-admission document.

- In the meantime though, can I get a quick chorus of "Free at Last; Thanks God almighty, we're free at last...!"

- My favourite of his attempted knocks against me over time has been his obsession with whether I am posting 'informative' content, or sometimes for not posting anything at all (!), while he posts an seemingly endless stream of overhyped trivia, outright misinformation and half-baked, often irrelevant speculation, powers right through the endless fact-checks that follow, and somehow that is superior to me occassionally posting what a. complete tool he is, or even not posting anything at all. Did the guy think he would get a pass because he was really, really sincere or because he was the first to present the results of an AI prompt? Sheesh....

- Swanny, we hardly knew ye. See you next week?

For those who are rightly squinting at his last few fur balls trying to find an apology, or any recognition at all of how spectacularly irrelevant they were at best, and dangerously misinformed at worst, let me translate: the kids call that a cope. Sadly, yet again, it is just someone with a completely misaligned ego trying desperately to appear relevant who ends up spewing so much misinformation, it ends up defying any normal person’s ability to fact-check.

Butt out?!? seriously, have you no shame at all. Of all the mountains of links and stories and prose you've coughed up, not one, not a single one, have been of any consequence whatsoever, and much of it is plain misleading and/or misinformation. That's because the information is completely misfiled or irrelevant and you are too naive or just too f-ing thick to understand that no matter how clever you think your AI prompting may be, its still garbage in, bs out.

One fabulous example: sle have an equity stake in ELI. THAT IS ALL. No matter what a judge may have erroneously stated, that will NEVER be the basis for an enforceable windup of the company. NO ONE involved, least of all Brightwater, has any illusions they will be able to successfully windup San Leon no matter how many different websites report the same erroneous nonsense, so of course Brightwater are looking still to settle with a relevant party and NOT SLE. You cannot seem to understand that bc your ego is so clogging what's left of your reasoning centres, that you are deaf dumb and blind to the realities.

For the sanity of everyone here, go back to naughty step, stay away from your bloody keyboard, and wait until a grown up calls you.

You misunderstand me, lucky. I understand completely how the jv works and how and why the progress for all the early projects Eco is forging around the world matter. (tbf, Senegal is relatively minor compared to Chile or the recently announced deal in Indonesia - both of which can be company-makers - but nevertheless, it has its place). In fact, I've been helping readers here better understand the Eco business model since before the RTO.

The reason I pointed out that the Senegal advance would naturally remain in country and in the project there, and not roll up onto the plc's balance sheet, is simply because I'm pretty sure from reading this board and its sister over at advfn, that some shareholders appear to think otherwise.

For the record, I assume everyone understands that this deposit payment does NOT accrue to the plc as cash, yes? That money, when its paid, remains in country in the JV....

'....Don't Shoot the messenger!!...'

Ok, but what do you suggest instead? Pat you on the head and give you a treat if you'll stay away from your keyboard like we do with bs?

The important stuff is still to come: first the early March decision on the quantum of the penalty since I pretty sure he has latitude to award far more than the most recent £50m judgement and stretch back to the original £187m contract violation.

But wait, there's more: when Fanning is quoted that sle will register the judgement in any and all jurisdictions in which not only TRIAM, but more specifically, Ali pere and fils operate in, he is clearly signalling that failure to abide by the award becomes enforceable by international institutions like INTERPOL so that even an attempt to enter any major Western country can turn into an 'Excuse me sir, could you accompany agents into that windowless room please' experience.' Don't get me wrong: I still think that collecting anything from this mysterious 'hedge fund' remains a tall order, but if these 2 weirdos are running anything approaching a genuine fund management company, the genuine threat of arrest if they even attempt to travel to any of what constitutes 95% of the relevant markets they would be investing in, could prove more than enough incentive for the old man to try and settle, if not pay the entire award once it is officially announced. So I concede that the odds of a a great, big cherry on top of any much larger deal OF (hopefully) manages to close on in the coming weeks, are certainly narrowing.

…more like being attacked by a dead fish

I thought the worst example of GIGO was bs working an AI prompt. Now I know it’s BS IN, <37k OUT

Would someone please take away their keyboards?!?

I'm sorry to legitimate readers here for re-printing this post, but its necessary unless and until this guy ceases publishing irrelevant information or worse. I'm not going to risk anyone coming here for actionable information to be in any doubt about what's happening as a result of this horror show of 'When bs met AI'.....

Bs has now officially gone off the deep end, motives unclear. (For instance, it is possible he is doing this entirely to wind me up sufficiently that I post this very type of message, which I'm sure many would agree is an even more serious indication of a cloudy mind than just being committed to re-printing half truths and pure gibberish).

Bottom Line for now: there is no imminent decision, on 23 Feb or any other time, looming in any court anywhere that will impact the Company's ability to continue to trade as was and continue to pursue a transformational deal. His entire thesis in all his recent posts is completely, fatally flawed.

As a result of his increasing unhinged-ness, I will seek to get LSE oversight to deal with this, but failing that, readers should make every effort to ignore and/or simply discount anything he contributes for the foreseeable future. I acknowledge and appreciate Redyeye and GTJD making their own efforts to call-out and/or discredit his shameful activities.

Bs has now officially gone off the deep end, motives unclear. (For instance, it is possible he is doing this entirely to wind me up sufficiently that I post this very type of message, which I'm sure many would agree is an even more serious indication of a cloudy mind than just being committed to re-printing half truths and pure gibberish).

Bottom Line for now: there is no imminent decision, on 23 Feb or any other time, looming in any court anywhere that will impact the Company's ability to continue to trade as was and continue to pursue a transformational deal. His entire thesis in all his recent posts is completely, fatally flawed.

As a result of his increasing unhinged-ness, I will seek to get LSE oversight to deal with this, but failing that, readers should make every effort to ignore and/or simply discount anything he contributes for the foreseeable future. I acknowledge and appreciate Redyeye and GTJD making their own efforts to call-out and/or discredit his shameful activities.

I name-call because on. the one hand you rightly cite Penny as a recognised investment pro and then you claim BATM got 'Zvi's worthless shares' for the diagnostic business, shares Penny is on record saying are worth between 2x and over 5x the price at which the transaction was struck. In my valuation, Moti played a blinder, effectively buying back a massive stake in the company at a knock-down price so that when the shares are cancelled, as they likely will be, the remaining growth operating businesses will make the share price look way cheaper.

'Zvi's worthless shares for the diagnostics company underlines my point....'

The only 'point' you're underlining is that you are financially illiterate

Thanks, red

This is all starting to get weird, frankly. Its as if bs is going out of his way to throw out as much unverified, often very low probability or even impossible event predictions, to see what sticks, than ever before. And as the volume of dis- and misinformation increases, the accountability declines commensurately, replaced by this absolutely cringe effort to try and tart up his output using AI, as if that will eliminate his obligation to answer for all the debunked claims he keeps coughing up. You can almost feel his desperation coming off the board as you read that, please god SOMETHING, out of the most serious mud he's slinging turns out to be even partially true, just so he point and finally say 'I told you so.' Sad.

No one left to be surprised by yet another fact check:

1. there is no imminent issue with brightwater. No windup order has been issued nor is there likely to be one anytime in the relevant future as per the reasons already provided previously. Therefore no one has to sweat anything out of the 'Irish courts over the next few weeks in brightwater v san leon', as the worst that will emerge is another irritating 'decision' which SLE can and will appeal and put off any relevant order for many months to come, by which time of course, some kind of deal is likely to be long since struck. For all intents and purposes, it is another meaningless item in the calendar, which this sloppy googler is attempting to signal-boost to fill some empty space in his ego. I mean, ffs already.....

2. Otherwise, of the latest AI backwash he's so proud of, the most seemingly impactful, as well as - SHOCK! as this is bs afterall - the most spectacularly misleading is the overhyped conclusions about Cawthorne. In short, Cawthorne is a relatively minor evacution system relative to the eventual capacity of ACEOS. It is very much NOT a 'bypass' for ACEOS or in any way some kind of existential threat, as this serial misinformation merchant so gleefully implies. In fact, I have always assumed SLE will likely build a short spur link to Cawthorne to further enhance its client reach and capacity. See my 'ffs' plea above.....

God, talk about trying to bury the lead:

".....Your comment on bluerill: This is an old chat board story that's been going on for years now. I have ceased to engage with the fellow, as doing so opens a stream of often pointless postings as he seeks to dominate the chat board with his aggressive salad-style posting. Nuf said! ..."

'.....This is an old chat board story that's been going on for years now....' No, it so isn't. You likely dredged it up from the depths of the dark web populated by QAnon followers and assorted broken souls

'.....I have ceased to engage with the fellow....' That's certainly true. I constantly point out how much of your googly/AI 'contributions' are often empty drivel at best, and lately, have devolved to signal-boosting obvious misinformation from others who are even dumber or more shameless than you, and you indeed tend to come back with hilariously meaningless blather where you try to sideswipe me instead of addressing the fact-checks. As for engaging on a level where a simple apology for posting the most recent hateful nonsense, also not so much.

'.....stream of often pointless postings as he seeks to dominate....' Yeah well, shame for you then that, on this board, only you and your therapist see it that way.

'.....Nuf said!....' Soon enough, that will represent the closest thing to an accurate take on the future that you will have posted here in a long time. And don't shoot the messenger; you will only have had yourself to blame.

Wow, cope much?

I particularly loved the cringe final 'paragraph' where you try and cosplay as an OF fan who - golly gee! - is rooting hard from the sidelines for the Company to succeed as if yesterday never happened. Go Team! Am I right?

So you reckon 'the postings on the chat board have been getting a little heated of late...', do you? Well, you're right, but its not because of your cringe attempted pivot to the interminable wait we've all endured (again: absolutely loved you trying to get nostalgic by referencing the 'Nigerian and Polish sagas'. Again, brilliant effort, with particular props for invoking Poland. One has to stop and admire your sheer shamelessness in trying to change the subject and suggest you have common cause with legitimate shareholders here, sometimes. Its truly breathtaking). No, that 'little' bit of heat has come from exactly one arsonist alone and he has managed to burn his own house down first along with what remained of his credibility.

Oh, and you are still an f-ing coward. Let''s not forget the classics.

Thank-you Zoo, I really appreciate that.

Fwiw, I'm still processing the circumstances around bs's meltdown yesterday (Did I mention what a massive boner that was? Big. Real big. Big big big. So big....). My early take is that this is very possibly someone who truly believes that whatever he finds on the internet machine is true. For me, his original sin has always been and will always be his insistence on sharing virtually whatever link his googling prompts for 'san leon', 'nnpc', 'eroton', etc return, and then publishing them here no matter how dubious the website or outrageous the claims, often compounding his malfeasance by providing the most childish bearish commentary laced with the kind of ominous innuendo that the more profoundly corrupt morons like the r*cist or <37k, etc. cough up regularly.

As a result, the most generous view on yesterday's complete meltdown therefore becomes that this guy's love affair with anything google returns is enhanced 10x if the respondent is an AI platform; ie., bs really believed, first, that the court 'timelines' AI returned were somehow plausible when even the most rudimentary logical effort would prove the opposite, and then, when I debunked it all within minutes, in one of the most spectacular double-down, fit-of-pique-induced brain farts I've ever witnessed on these miserable message boards, he goes and publishes ANOTHER unedited (or so he claimed) AI garbage dump, this time devoted entirely to sliming me and a couple completely innocent parties personally. Shocking yes, but what will be even more shocking, is how dramatically this will backfire on him.

Sorry, my posts are of course the perfect marriage of relevant legal, financial and political corporate information, mixed with the ideal measure (luddites dismiss this key ingredient as 'wordy') of rhetorical flourish, so I rarely need a post-posting edit. However, this most recent message is in immediate need of a quick touch-up:

Instead of 'You went too far, bs,......', it should read, 'You went way, way, way, waaaaaaayyyyy, too far, bs. Next county too far, double-black diamond with no ski poles too far. No coming back from the sht you have dropped yourself in too far....' Phew, fixed it