Member Info for bluerill

* that should read: 'the comment section of.....'Shair Profits'. Apparently the owners here consider tom winnifrith as his miserable rag competition

gtjd: stop. whatever you may want to imply as to my level of wound-up-ness, for whom or why you're posting, or what your share ownership position is or isn't, is of absolutely no consequence to me anyone else here. furthermore, whatever you think you 'know' and then can or cannot share is likewise spectacularly irrelevant, and all i can say for certain is that it is far, far less than you think. best i can tell is that you've combined a few tidbits a friend shared with you with a bit of googling, and then you get a kick out of periodically coming on an anonymous message board and trying to cosplay as some kind of mysterious knower of stuff. when the time is right, you can read what's happening in country and then i'll be happy to answer any of your questions. until then, try and stick to the comment sections on *************.

With paraphrasing thanks to Mike Tyson, "Everyone is an expert until they get punched in the mouth..." , Q.E.D. my flat a**, you coward

I don't know about all that history sam, but you'll notice my posted response to him trailed off mid-sentence. That was obviously because I hit 'post message' by accident, but I kind of think its a metaphor for my 'disputes' with guys like JustUnder37,000. Guys like him are so twisted up in their anger and feelings of betrayal - none of which I begrudge mind you, It's just that this is not the forum for them to work out those issues constantly - that they are barely conscious that their postings constitute little more than therapy rants, high on emotion and nearly completely devoid of relevant content. And then of course, they go and make things 10x worse by, instead of debating the merits of my argument based on credible sources or demonstrated experience in the capital markets. or Nigerian O&G, or even showing facility in Swanny's forte, advanced googling techniques, he chooses instead to attack me for MY tone and/or MY language. Of course my previous post trailed off incomplete. It was losing the will to live.

Qf - I'm sorry.. You didn't deserve to be called a hypocrite. I was out of line

Just below 37k - honestly, you have to stop. You literally didn't read a single word I wrote, instead choosing to just assert you don't believe me and then go on return to your pattern of angry insults (very badly) disguised as insights. That's you in a nutshell. Simply assert something, like what I've written is not true, and then you can go off (you think) and share your totally useless musings which, in your mind are justified because they're negative AND you're really, really angry, lack of any market or company knowledge be damned. From there its just more blather and ad hominem directed at me.

Quote me absolutely anything I've written that's 'rhetoric'. And while you're trying and failing to do that, I can share a dozen examples from you wasting everyone's time doing precisely that like your 'rhetoric' around the bond assignment.

Though you clearly have no earthly idea about anything you're writing about, driven by self-righteous anger, you nonetheless plow ahead and make baseless claims about the company's financing efforts, while hurling insults at everyone from fanning to me along the way, likely because it just makes you feel better. And if that wasn't bad enough, you have the gall to come on and accuse ME of trafficking in misleading rhetoric. Understand something above all else,

Very creative response, just below 40k. Deflect much? Meantime, write less, read more. I'm posting here AFTER the damage is done. Suspension, de-listing, delay ('interminable' as per my description) are in the rearview mirror. NOW the question is, Is all lost and the shares worthless (I can't remember, Which genius sited 'the 'number to the left of this message' as the true price of the shares, you or some other clever clog?), or does a large credit facility secured against the bond assignment disclosed mid 2024 remain a credible option and if so, How would it work in reality? These are obviously crucial questions which I have tried to tackle here help, but unfortunately I often have to hack through dopey guesswork and ignorant speculation from cretins like you who seem to think being really, really angry somehow inoculates their posts from a general standard demand for expertise and accuracy. As a result, constantly having to correct phoney bulletin board warriors like you ends up making someone like me seem like I'm being overly positive just because I don't waste readers time screaming incoherently about a history we can't change, and instead focus on whether or not we have a future.

Your recent screed about 'the bond' is a perfect example. You thought nothing about posting absolute gibberish about this potential transaction, ranting about 'lifestyle companies' and how the 'bond was about as real as James Bond' (ugh), when in fact - discovered after a lot of effort - I learned and posted a while ago that, although this is a niche area in the. capital markets, there is registered proof that an entity controlled by San Leon has in fact been assigned a 1/2B euros of this German government bond series from its owner and as a result, is legally able to borrow against it. But in your mind, despite the fact I'm pretty sure you don't know the difference between a Bund position and a kaiser roll, your incoherent, ignorant rant, with its rank misinformation, is somehow superior to mine because yours shakes a fist at the company and accuses its CEO of fraud and profligacy. Got it.

And I would finish this latest needless distraction with a question that will surely destroy what remains of your warped worldview: where is your evidence that this 'lifestyle' company is being run by someone who, by your clear implication, has in fact been drawing compensation during this horrible suspension/de-listing period and doing nothing? I've unfortunately been familiar with Martin Hughes's position in the past with a different company, and I remember the dominant shareholder insisting salaries be cut during a long suspension period like this and then, if it extends over a longer period of time, suspended altogether. Seems to me that yet another of the bitter slurs you toss around so liberally as if it was objective truth, is no more evidenced than any of the others you simply assert because, you know, you said so, and you do it as Mr Angry.

Not nearly as clearly as I see you, gtjd. You're intentionally moving your message from pillar to post, going from bearish commentary, based on severely incomplete information that you then fill out with wild speculation re important items of which you clearly know nothing - like San Leon's debt position being upwards of $100m because 'its been going on for 5 years', a wild guess so hilariously off-base that its no wonder you refuse to apologise for it - all the way back to being encouraging when you're challenged, as you have just done again, possibly due an immature need to appear relevant to a bunch of strangers. Whatever the reason, spare me your phoney modesty, and try asking more questions instead of making baseless assertions and you won't have to continue with this schizophrenia act.

Seriously, qf? You think even a cursory review of your recent posts would support your credibility in making such an argument, or would it instead signal you out as maybe the biggest self-unaware hypocrite on this board since the r**ist troll here who thinks posting in pidgin English is so hilarious? I started posting again here to try and balance out some of the misinformation and/or ignorant speculation of others whose motives, for me, are largely irrelevant, as is the fact that the shares are not trading at present. There are plenty of shareholders here who need to know they still own an asset of significant potential value, despite the company's interminable silence and even the fact that the shares have been de-listed. For me, that's more than enough of a difference.

'....but lets assume circa $80/$100m dollars today...' Jesus H Christ, gtjd, let's not! What a spectacularly ridiculous flight of utter fantasy. The rest of your post is once again riddled with baseless speculation, but an ignorant whopper like that makes it virtually impossible to attempt to deal with you even half-seriously. Along with ethically and intellectually suspect sponsors such as callusjunkie, now very much of the other board, and/or credulous boobs like JustUnder40k, you seem to be getting just enough partial info and half-truths from in Country to appear vaguely credible, and then you seem to hope you can spread that widely enough to cover your true purpose which seems, sadly, to proffer a narrative where this Project is somehow progressing without SLE and/or OF, which is patently untrue. Only thing I haven't worked out yet is who's pulling your strings and why.

Why don't you and your metronomic messages go pound sand? You post the exact same dopey message every couple days, with the only alteration being whatever cringey metaphor you try and use each time. Clearly, the only reason you do it in the first place is to try and get a rise out of someone as you seem to have done with me in this instance. Congrats, you can go and tell your therapist you got your 5-a-day today.

Attaboy nobs, totally ignore what a complete tool you've just made of yourself and try to power right through the humiliation. That's the can-do spirit that's carried you to the very top of your field: lurking on a miserable share message board sharing hackneyed commentary poorly disguised as sophisticated analysis. Go team...

And don't look now truro, but our resident scholar - in the same f-ing sentence no less - managed to confuse the Dominican Republic and Chile, making his calling you an illiterate t@#t one of the great exercises in projection in the history of these message boards. Oh well, at least he spelt 'Chile' correctly.

Well presented, truro. As for his breathtakingly undeserved assertion of educational superiority, you might also point out that right before using that slur to refer to you - apparently for the high crime of disagreeing with his take on the company - the pompous muppet misspelt 'you'. Can't make it up

Much better, ripley. This way, OF and his advisors can concentrate on closing this bond deal and then look to re-list anywhere but AIM! (I believe the rumour shared at the time was potentially a dual re-listing in Dubai and the US, which makes a lot of sense to me).

Looks like some early photos of foundations going in for show houses in Chile have gone up on X:

https://x.com/ECOBPLC

Crikey, unless that's some sort of elaborate wind-up, readers would be forgiven for wondering if junkie had sneaked back on this board disguised as a number just below 37k.....Anyway, tell you what, 36800, since I've obviously triggered your fight-or-flight response with all my twaddle, as a gesture of goodwill, I'll give you a 1000% return on your quoted price and pay you 1p for all your shares. And don't let anyone come on here and fill your head with any more nonsense like the only reason the price is showing 0 is because the shares have been de-listed. You are obviously as much on top of the economics here as you are your emotions, and you can use the proceeds for another couple days of anger management class. In fact, your mini-rant on the share price was actually the sanest of ALL your comments. so you've got that going for you. Don't change a thing.....

Stellar job once again, BS. Endorsing a r^c*st cutting and pasting a chatGPT history lesson no one asked for, as shareholders instead wait on the outcome of a transformational deal on which you aren't able to google anything, and so have nothing of any consequence to share. Great look.

Surely a far more reliable rule is to beware whatever follows 'be warned'from a bitter, dried up old windbag on an anonymous message board.

And bd knows that for certain based on his long fantasy career in capital markets and the dozens of fund raise roadshows he's attended in his imagination. Nothing indeed