RE: Val's proggress27 Jan 2019 09:55
Gilders,
I felt very confident in their product pipeline, that’s why I’ve invested a lot more money averaging down, than I normally would in a small biotech company on AIM that is for sure.
But there’s only so far you can go, with lack of information and a company that, lets face it have form.
My gripe is the lack of information at such a crucial stage of shareholders support for the company. I myself haven’t been invested as long as some of you guys, but can fully understand why some of you long term investors are getting pi55ed of with lack of updates, and general confidence moving forward.
Then getting accused of not being invested or de-ramping the company. I believe most investors that post on here are infact investors imo.
But feel there needs to be some more concrete information.
The silence is bizarre from a company that supposedly is on the brink of “bloody greatness” and I truly hope it is for everyone’s sake.
I think it’s disgusting if true uncanny, that some of our company directors are joking about the dissatisfaction and concerns from the LONG TERM HOLDERS because it won’t be new investors “YET” regarding fresh company information and regular updates, that would clearly help support the current SP in their own company.
Then maybe like myself, would consider a final large investment in valirx at this level to try and get some value back if we had confidence with the direction. ( Its not a lot to ask valirx )
Unfortunately I believe a lot of lth think their fingers are going too get burnt again.
So it’s over to you BOD when you stop joking at our expense, to get the show back the road to recovery, if all is true support with some information, it’s hard honestly?
I’m also going to mirror what Dracula wrote yesterday in his recommended post, I also don’t get any gratification in these posts, i would much prefer to be writing far more positive posts about our company and directors.
GLA
BP
Sign In
Follow the stocks
