Member Info for blueboy1975

Lols, nevermind all Bell's promises. Red Rock showed a profit 15 years ago, and most recently, 7 years ago. Good case for investment? Well Nikes trying his best to argue it 😄.

Banbury, he makes me laugh too much to keep him on filter. He should stick to Tenesse Williams than Red Rock RNS.

You're cherry picking years to support your posts, ignoring facts. Now I've been here 11 or 12 years, look at the SP when I bought. It has never been higher in any year since. Granted this is not relevant to all SH, but it is to the majority. The few years you've selected are not really worth applause are they? Anyway, what's the SP today?

And to boot, I think I've held here for 11 or 12 years, my shares have NEVER been in profit. If I could I would screen shot and show you, but you'd still come out with some flannel to try disprove it. This is reality Nike, not your amateur attempts to change history.

You've conveniently ignored the 25:1 consolidation there Nike. This falsely raised the SP.

No tick up still, and no news. But that's no surprise. Maybe we need another attempt at a chart? It might tempt Hapless' "friends" (another lie there) to post, as he claims they don't because of negativity or whatever rubbish he put.

The thing is, it all boils down to whether you believe Bell or not, we can too and fro and argue but it's all down to him delivering...or not.

I'm on the fence by the way 🤥

Lols, looking at the 10 year chart on here - hardly something to fill anyone with optimism! A general decline, with an odd few manufactured spikes, billions more shares in issue. I think it's a reasonable assumption that no LT SH has made any money out of here, traders maybe, and good luck to them. Bell might have made the company accounts look like they've made a profit (very occasionally) but it's never been much use for genuine SH.

Yawning hell, sorry for butting on date night. So Nike, despite all your waffle, you accused someone of being aggressive and will say nothing about the worst aggressor on this board. Very simple, hypocrisy at is finest. And despite all your attempts to twist anyones posts, whilst conveniently ignoring Hapless’ blatant misleading statements, shows what an utter sycophant you really are.

I’m not quite sure what your ‘sub’ comment meant, I’m always happy to take money off mugs if your offering, maybe I’m a bit like Bell in that way. But don’t be dipping into your Tennant’s super strength fund on my account 🍻

Without answering the question of course, which sort of answers it anyway...

Nike, what's your opinion on Hapless - a proven liar who is continually aggressive to other posters here? Oh wait, don't bore me some long winded pathetic attempt to pretend you're clever and defend him.

I think I'm going to like being another self appointed board traffic warden.

Bullying?! Lols, what a pair of wet wipes. Hapless calls everyone names from FW, socks puppet, lycra boy, boring Boy etc, day in day out. All OK in your eyes and you slavishly recommend his posts. Get a bit given to yourself and you try and play the bully card, what a pair of hypocrites. I've no time for toadies - or liars, and will highlight as and when I want.

A quick catch up here to see the toady one spending his day defending the king of hypocrisy hapless. Accusing people of spending too much time on here? How very rich! You won’t have an opinion on that though will you Nike? Too selective in what you consider to be misleading posts, never mind your heroes thousands of claims which have never come to anything.

Anyway, we now enter yet another “rich” period for news. Let’s see what this brings.

3 RNS’ s Monday is it Hapless? Still waiting for the three you reckoned would come in Jan. To be fair there was one, dilution…as per. You’ll call it right one day, or maybe not!

Maybe, just maybe, Bell was talking crap again and trying to encourage buying (see every other RNS reach for further examples)

Just vintage hapless, implying one thing then straight faced denying it. As he says, the posts are all there to read still. I await his spin on the next placing…‘it’s not dilutive’….’why would the service providers take shares instead of money’..the man’s a walking, talking liar, keeping good company with Bell. End of.

Banbury, please don't ever stoop so low as to apologise to that utter cretin! He gives it out plenty so the old fraud should be able to take it.

Let's all see what delights the agm reveals.....I mean, what could possibly be agreed? (Just in time for a late Fri dilution event) 🫣

IMO of course...

Sold has it? Or is that you making stuff up again? Nike will be all over you for lying on here

17:56 as boring as the others, but i can't be bothered to put all the times in. Anyway, what's your excuse for posting gibberish constantly? Waiting for another trade? Same as the others on here, or do you fancy yourself as some sort of board traffic warden?

Kept you off filter Nike, it makes me laugh at what a toady you are. Much more fun for me.

Good luck with those licences…maybe this week eh?

Not sure who I've belittled? And yes, to repeat , it would be good if Bell actually pulled something off. Personally I think it's a load of rubbish again, seen it too many times with this two.

Nike, you corpse, of course I'm culpable for any decision I make. I've never denied this and as you've checked my posting history in such detail you will know this. I'm saying Bell and hapless are culpable for repeatedly leading SH on with claims of big things about to happen which never materialise. Now be a good boy and go get up hapless' backside again.

I can't speak for Banbury, but I personally would be over the moon if Bell secured anything that he claims is possible. I'd (probably) get my money back and maybe a little on top. I would slither off relatively happy. Do I believe he will? Absolutely not, so I'll stick around bemoaning my losses and blaming it all on Bell...and hapless coz he's just as culpable in this charade.