RE: Sierra Shareholder Meeting 1800 today29 Jun 2022 18:40
In the here and now I don't agree, SOG. Its just not what I'm seeing from the CPF agreement - within the license agreement there are 'NO' (like zero) oncology indication on licensing provisions. Only non-oncology indication provisions.
'If' GSK want to on license, they are going to have to first sort something out with the CPF by way of a formal agreement. In that case, YES, I agree that being GSK will give them some helpful muscle in those discussions. But, the black and white of the agreement means they are going to have to get the CPF on board before being able to do any oncology indication on licensing.
Bill.