The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
I have been an investor for 18 months and hence delighted to see a recognition of value. The shares are tightly held and hence during that period the price has reacted to RNS, but little else, only to drift back down again. I have always felt that none of these prices were correct, when compared to other entertainment companies and the board were quite right to seek a listing on NYSE as the UK does not place a high value on these type of companies. The abortive attempt to list previously that was postponed without setting a revised date was obviously frustrating, but I am glad I did not sell.
A rapid rise will also mean profit taking opportunities, more sellers than buyers and other things being equal the price will fall. However note the volumes traded are small, therefore not a true price and the upward path remains intact.
As far as I understand it generally means that the broker's opinion, at that price level the share is good value, because it is likely to offer better returns than the average for the sector.
Could be a big buyer disguising itself with lots of small purchases, yesterday there was a stream of small purchases within minutes of each other. I have been invested some while, but have only recently starting following the trades.
Indicators are very much in agreement with a strong push upward. http://www.barchart.com/opinions/stocks/VEC.LS
integrity are more open to question. (words chopped off although within the count).
I have previously posted my personal success with online dating, finding my new wife and my knowledge of the industry from the inside. It’s why I invested – it is cash generator of exponential potential and I have seen nothing to detract from that. The sale of the ‘Casual Dating Sites’, for £45.1m was a sizeable piece of its trade. They have the profits in advance for 49p / share at current share issue. Sound business sense especially as it was the seamier side. There are 11,000 dating sites in the UK and Cupid was chosen probably because it’s a Scottish company and the only quoted company. Any company selling fake profiles on a huge scale signifies a problem in the industry; there cannot be a supply without a demand and the Information Commissioner needs to wake up to this. This is yet another abuse of data holding and selling that is endemic in the world we now live. I am TPS registered and yet I must get three calls a day from investment companies alone. I have never given any permission for my data to be sold to others for any products. Probably strikes a chord with many of you. As for the antics of Global Personals Ltd, (GP), that name is already known to me from personal experience. Foul # 1: I signed up with a dating site, filled out the form for a month’s access, made an error and was taken back a page to correct. But my credit card was debited for six months worth by GP, a company I had never heard of. On complaining, I found out that their site automatically resets to the default access to 6 months if you have to correct any detail. It turned out to be a lucky mistake or otherwise I would never have met my wife. Foul # 2: Innocently, you think that the people who contact you are from the same website as you. No. Your info goes to White Label Dating owned by GP, segregated only in to hetero, gay and young adult, where it swims in a much larger pool with piranhas for the unwary (foreign and UK based money seeking crooks) and a fair bit of water near the sewage outflow (cam girls), and is accessed by any dating site buying the data. GP blamed spammers. Why I was getting this kind of contact when I specified middle aged in the UK near where to I live. I did not know this when I signed up. Both my wife and I were contacted by many people who did not fit our profiles and neither of us suffered from the tail off of contact after we signed up. This was probably due to the diaries we wrote to differentiate ourselves. Foul # 3: I signed up to a second site, thinking I was broadening my reach. I sent 53 emails to women on the site but received no response. This seemed implausible given the success on the other site and it made me look more critically: I found the photographs were pinched from elsewhere on the net, something GP denied. I now believe all of these were fake profiles. Cupid may well have some dirty linen, but GP should be the target as their methods and their i