Member Info for Bfdinvestor

The question I can't find the answer to is why southcoast and Hexam try so hard to try to talk down anything remotely positive.

Debs probably will make a statutory loss this year.

Personally I don't care, I'm bothered about cash and the business actually improving.

It's not going bust this year, just as it wasn't last year despite southcoast's protestations to the contrary

Nobody is trying to hide the chairman's statement bloggs.

You keep posting the same bit.

The problem is, there is no reference to anything being on hold or any firm indication that the licences won't be renewed.

It seems you are still unable to post anything that is specific to the active licence in Mali.

But all that is by the by as this discussion related to your statement that there were no gold licences because you didn't know the name of the company that holds the active Mali licence

No bloggs, you specifically stated no gold because you didn't know which company held the licence. I'm still waiting for you to post any specific reference from the chairman about the active Mali licence and more specifically what he has said that would imply it won't be renewed. So far you have failed miserably

Come on Bloggs.....

Bloggs you started off by stating that we had no licences. You weren't even aware of the company that holds the licence

When that piece of stupidity was shown for what it was, you moved onto the chairmans statement

So maybe you can show a specific reference to Mali and the active licence in that statement.

So you are trying to deflect from what you originally stated in any way you can. Just because, in your own mind, it is impossible for you to be wrong

No bloggs however many times you try to deny it we have mining licence for gold in Mali, per the central repository

You were wrong, however many times you try to deny it

End of story.

Oh Bloggs you keep embarrassing yourself

So you claim we have no gold licence in Mali despite the central Mali repository stating that we do

But they must be wrong and you must be right because you didn't know the name of the subsidiary company that owns the licence. Despite that company being listed in the Kodal accounts.

Give it a rest bloggs

So now the Mali central repository that you posted the link to is wrong Bloggs.

Just when I thought you couldn't make yourself look even more stupid.

It seems everything and everyone can be wrong apart from you.

Yet you have a track record for being wrong

You were wrong about the first shipment being delayed

You were wrong about the price

You were wrong about Bernard being scared to go to the inauguration

You are deluded bloggs

Our Mali gold licence is active and valid until May chef

So why are you posting that it isn't serviceable for the foreseeable future

Where is your evidence for that?

Just because bloggs doesn't know which company owns the licence doesn't mean it doesn't exist

How much have you put in here?

Upwards of a quid is possible, I just think it's too far for the next 12 months

Would love to be wrong

Bloggs I'm not going round in circles with you

You stated we had no gold licences

We do

End of story

Go and read the interims and understand the company structure rather than digging yourself in deeper and deeper and wasting other people's time

No bloggs I'm correcting you

You stated there were no gold licences because you referenced a company that no longer exists.

You didn't check the company that now holds the active mining licence in Mali. Despite it being listed in Kodal accounts.

So as usual you were wrong and can't admit it. Its just one more to add to the list of things you have got wrong but can never admit to.

All of the pointless deflection doesn't take away from that.

No bloggs the simple fact is you stated there were no gold licences.

The licence in Mali is active.

Just because you are unaware of a subsidiary business doesn't mean it is obscure. It is in the accounts. If you haven't done appropriate research and therefore post stupid inaccurate rubbish, then that is down to you and nobody else

This was your start position and it was totally wrong Bloggs. And why insult anybody, its embarrassing. Enough said

JoeBloggs28

Posted in: KOD

Posts: 1,419

RE: Gold price 5300 US$/OzToday 09:36

The Mali gold licences were held by Future Minerals SARL, if you look on the Mali Repository they have no active gold licences.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://mali.revenuedev.org/&ved=2ahUKEwiOzMD29q2SAxWIQEEAHRoMAJEQFnoECA0QAQ&usg=AOvVaw0M3ozIi3sgbkactDH1eU1b

JoeBloggs28

Posted in: KOD

Posts: 1,419

RE: Gold price 5300 US$/OzToday 09:21

Elco you nutter, he's saying that if kodal have lost the licences (looks likely according to rns) then they have no gold.

Oh dear Bloggs

You stated we had no licences in Mali because you referenced a company that no longer exists.

You didn't know that the subsidiary company that now holds the active mining licence in Mali even existed and hour ago

Now, because you can't ever admit that you are wrong and your trolling has failed, you are trying to pivot to issues with the overall gold portfolio licences.

It's pathetic Bloggs and totally transparent

Please stop polling the board, you are just wasting your own and everyone else's time with your ineptitude

How far down are you now Bloggs

Go and check your own link to the Mali site.

You will find an active licence for international goldfields.

You know, that subsidiary of Kodal that you knew nothing about half an hour ago.

Just comical

But your stupidity is now starting to ruin the board, so that's my last reply

I'd agree bigdaddy, no reason why 75p is beyond reach if the turnaround continues at pace.

If a couple of non core brands are sold it may be a different discussion

Nothing to do with the chairman Bloggs

You simply didn't know the name of the right company to put into the table you provided and the type of licence it held.

So the only person who is wrong is you Bloggs.

Still, keep digging, it is hilarious

I know Lav

Bloggs just can't help himself

He is digging so much maybe Bernard should offer him a job.

Any actual investor would be happy have their knowledge of the business improved in a positive way

As I'm sure Onlyking is

Nope it's a mining licence to develop into a small working mine subject to the licence code

You need to give it up Bloggs. You are just embarrassing yourself. For once, admit you are wrong.