Member Info for Bentley43

Disgruntled ex employee I assume as they clearly have an agenda.

I’m leaving this board as it’s too toxic there’s no balanced discussion just constant slanderous misinformation from said individual so they can put this down to a win in their sad lives.

Meanwhile I stay fully invested as a significant shareholder and wish genuine holders every success.

Rob Shepherd: I understand the concern. We IPO’d in February and completed another placing in December, which was difficult for everyone, especially our CEO who holds a significant shareholding.

But investors should focus on growth. The loss figures were based on monthly billings of around £353,000 to £360,000, and we’re already at around £500,000 and growing. Our cost base is relatively stable now after investing heavily following IPO, including growing headcount and fitting out a new office.

As sales increase, more revenue flows through to the bottom line. We’re delivering ahead of expectations and currently see no immediate requirement for further investment funding. If larger contracts create working capital needs, there are alternative financing tools available.

What a shame no need for further funding at 1p and month on month growth with improved margins and stable overheads but don't forget the interview is paid for and they are all just lying about the business and probably go bust next week.

Remind you of anyone ?

Precisely so a years cash if you assume the same loss which will not be the case.

Did you actually read the results ?

"Entering the second half, we have visibility over more than GBP5.7m of FY26 revenue. The Company is well-funded, with cash of GBP1.8m at the Period end, and the Board remains confident in meeting market expectations for FY26."

Now that is what you call a positive set of results complete turnaround and primed to beat market expectations.

Many congratulations Paul and the team.

Precisely and it looks like the negativity has been stopped and rightly so people shouldn't be allowed to spread malicious false information about companies

The interesting thing at this price is your looking at a fully funded defence company that is valued at the same as it's projected turnover.

That is unheard of a multiple should definitely be applied to a business in any sector let alone a company working in national defence at this time.

Despite the negative comments here RCFX is extremely undervalued at this level now fully funded and part of a nationally significant solution to the the problems in the world.

Laura i agree with your sentiment this can easily treble from here and still be undevalued.

It’s simply an opposing opinion I was genuinely interested in your perspective of the companies prospects from this level and why you were so negative?

Would you say after the heavily discounted fundraising you alluded to its potential a good investment then or do you see no future in the business ?

Satans can I please ask why you have this fixated negative view on the company?

I understand it’s not been a good investment if you took part in the placing but shares do recover and with a low free float and increase in turnover ultimately in profitable they can recover quite dramatically.

Its always healthy to have differing opinions but other than the collapse in the share price can you please provide any true justification in your analysis.

Https://hybridan.com/friday-takeaway/22nd-may-2026/

Why do you believe there is another placing due they have only recently raised funds to support growth?

I take it you will be investing in the next placing if there is an opportunity or due you believe the company will fail which it seems you are alluding to.

Your constant berating of the company and the poor share price performance doesn’t ever seem to have any substance.

What is your agenda I’ve never experienced anything like this before are you saying you will join the institutions buying at 3p or do you see them going bust ?

They really are now in the right place and right time and with the new management this will certainly lead to a significant improvement in turnover and ultimately profitability.

Fully funded now and backed by quality institutions this is a time to buy.

A company definitely on the up and showing impressive growth but don’t forget the resident nutters suggesting a failure ahead and a 3p funding round to keep the lifestyle lights on.

They clearly know a lot more than the institutions that have backed the company.

I completely agree the only thing missing is news flow which is crucial for small companies to constantly remind investors of progress.

There’s no point in being a listed company without good PR to drive interest and the share price.

Can anyone enlighten me to why this endless posting of negativity without any substance or evidence of a failing company. I’ve been investing for over 20 years and have had many failures but RCFX has all the hallmarks of a successful company in the making supported by institutional investors which counts for a lot.

I’d like to understand the credibility of the negative posts if that’s possible?

I’m new to these boards and shocked at the drivel that gets repeated I was under the impression there would be some informative discussion about this company.

I’m a significant shareholder and understand the business model and would welcome a constructive response to why the company is berated when it’s in such a strong position?

For clarity I just bought 200,000 more shares and the offer price is 8.2p.

Despite the very confusing ramblings on this board this company is doing extremely well and is significantly undervalued in the sector.

Further positive news will see the price settling way above the six month highs.