RE: Bella CB13 Jul 2019 13:55
Bernie...I would never resort to calling you a miserable old BS...boring yes but not miserable...haha!
You are, of course, absolutely right the income from the AA does have to ultimately justify PXS's market cap. As I said, what and how DSM do it is up to them. PXS on the other hand have a great little set up and business model and have been strongly supported by DSM. IMO with a little more thought and planning, they could have directed a few quid and effort into working with and educating their customer base better and they might have been much further ahead with their sales and potentially in a position whereby FF+O virtually covered the majority of PXS costs. If nothing else it should have been their goal but it clearly wasn't. He couldn't see that in this day and age you don't have to spent the big bucks but you do have to show your face and engage with your customers which he won't do either!!!
in Jul-18 Month 25 they had around 2669 orders = £8,605 revenue
by Jan-19 Month 31 this had dropped to 2316 = £7,467
then in Feb-19 Month 32 3045 £9,817 the H&B effect started to kick in
and Mar-19 Month 33 4780 £15,411 again H&B
It also took roughly 27 months to turn the initial stock...!!!!
Alf ...PXS launched FF+O three years ago (June 2019 being month 36) - yes I did perhaps try to influence out of sheer frustration, but most of the time he ignored my input - except for James & James. FYI I've been helping a 26 year old family member for the last couple of years and he now has over 80,000 online followers, has just signed a mega deal, travels, speaks and hosts seminars all over the World, is a paid Forbes contributor, attends and presents at COPS, is regularly on TV, Radio and podcasts etc etc...advertising budget virtually zero!!!...