RE: REMX down to 3.1M now from 15.1M24 Dec 2019 14:41
Vaneck do say that their holdings must generate at least 505 of their revenue from mining.
Could Vaneck be selling out of BMN altogether on the basis BMN is moving away from being a single play and the Energy storage side of the business could at some point be worth 10 x that of the mining side. Now I know we aren't there yet by any stretch but a big chunk of the Eskom business would put us well on track and if you add up all the different income streams coming into play as we move forward.
Vaneck invested in BMN as a result of the Conference in Florida held by BMO (our new broker).
Now, either Vaneck have finally seen BMN as a duff play as they had to track the falling V price over the past year and the only way to offset their losses meant they had to loan out the shares but that in itself was a super dumb move because they loaned to shorter who drove the SP even further down.
Or, Vaneck was sophisticated vehicle used by BMO to raise funds for their new Lease Company via friendly shorters etc. So far we haven't heard anything further on this have we like the who, what and how's??? Banks utilise all sorts of means and vehicles to raise funds and what I'm suggesting is not necessarily illegal either and I certainly do not believe BMN have had anything to do with any wrong doings, but I do feel whatever has been going on in the Vaneck camp is not necessarily just dumb!!!
If they are going to sell out completely, then I'm sure they will be looking to clear by last working day of 2019 and as you say Alfa, this would also give them the funds to cover investor divi and the odd in-house bonus.
Right...shopping all done, drinks cabinet full and I for one am going to shut up and shut down now, but before I do, I would like to wish you all a very happy, safe and above all healthy Christmas with your most precious family and friends.